“scarcely significant”

The indirect costs results were scarcely significant compared with the direct costs, as they represent on average less than 2% of the total.

8 , 18 However, it is worth emphasizing that CT CAs are used at a much higher concentration than MRI ones; 8 , 31 , 32 , 59 hence the lower r 2 is scarcely significant for an alloy functioning as a multimodal MRI/CT CA.

plicatilis tests, but the differences in this case are scarcely significant.

Contrarily, the correlations between variable groups were small and scarcely significant ( Supplementary Material Tables S8–S10 ).

The main manganese excretory pathway is the biliary tract, and the urinary excretion is scarcely significant.

The difference was scarcely significant.

However, the negative influence of barriers was scarcely significant for Alopochen aegyptiaca .

The abovementioned areas are characterized by intensive agricultural activities that represent the predominant economic activity, whereas traffic and industrial activities can be considered absent or scarcely significant as PM sources.

Qualitative data simply "supports" quantitative conclusions, but in a sequential explanatory design, it should explain why and how changes occur, especially in empathy, which is scarcely significant.

On the other hand, criticism of peer review is huge (Fernández-Cano 1995 ); for example, the questionable concordance between reviewers who make inter-reviewer reliability scarcely significant and consequent revisions invalid and that is that; a valid review should involve replicating the study being reviewed, and this is very seldom done.

The results from (4) were just barely better than (3) , having higher correlations and lower standard deviations in Table 1 in only the third decimal place, scarcely significant.

It is probable that this degreeof correlation approaches the maximum Whichcan be obtained since the tests wereper- formed with material of apparently high potency in those whose histories were possibly as reliable as can ordinarily be securedin a group of a sizesufficientfor adequate statistical treat- ment. From Table IX it can be seen that the mean incidence of positive skin tests was substantially lower among those who denied a previous attack, although in two of the individual groups the differences are scarcely significant.

In conclusion, let us mention that the ligand–water interaction, irrespective of whether the ligand is REN or DER or whether the binding site is a heme or NADPH site, is scarcely significant.

Also, the volume presented by the second-order lateral roots showed a higher value in the downslope and windward quadrant, although differences were scarcely significant.