“quite significant”

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin was 0.92, and the Bartlett test results were quite significant (χ 2 = 4337.71, df = 78, p < 0.001).

However, this significant main effect was qualified by a quite significant interaction effect between actor power and trait valence, F (1, 39) = 12.46, p = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.24.

A complete response was found to be statistically quite significant in patients with the positive autologous serum test( p = 0.001).

When bed rails were used during the night, they had a protective effect, which is quite significant, as 37 of the 123 falls occurred during the night (P<0.001).

1 A and 1 B ) show that compared to the ZIKV control, twelve compounds of 11 – 17, 19, 20 , and 26 – 28 are potent agents against ZIKV infection with quite significant differences (*** P < 0.001) while six compounds of 1, 3, 5, 10, 21 and 23 express much weak anti-ZIKV activities with significant differences (** P < 0.01).

However, all three combinations produced quite significant (p < 0.001) effects on cell viability in comparison to control and the same concentration group of Cd.

Confirming that absenteeism trends change over time, especially during and following the COVID-19 epidemic, the year variable is also quite significant (F = 15.796, p < 0.001); partial η 2 = 0.028.

The relationship between knowledge and practices was quite significant ( p < 0.001).

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.989 and was quite significant at p<0.001.

In fact, women found the app easier to use ( M = 3.98 vs 3.45), and this difference was quite significant ( P < .001).

A quite significant correlation between the magnitude of ADRB index and IgG responses to PfMSP1p19 was found (Rho = 0.71 and 0.68, P < 10 −3 for Dielmo and Ndiop, respectively).

When the linearity of the relationship was assessed, it was statistically quite significant and linear (F=2.909; p<0.001).

Moreover, from summer to winter, the differences in the fungal composition of tissue niches were quite significant (root: R = 0.5703, p = 0.001; Leaf: R = 0.4023, p = 0.001) ( Figure 7 g,h).

Combination therapy decreased the rate of pyuria to 38.5% which was quite significant ( P = 0.001).

The relationship between the distribution of responses and the country of residence was quite significant (χ 2 = 54.64. p < 0.001).

The remarkable difference in the total BIS-11 score between groups was quite significant (p = 0.001), and a post-hoc test revealed that Group 3 had scored much higher than the other two groups (Table 5 ).

Although the n number included in the training set (n = 44) and test set (n = 11) was limited, it was quite significant with AUC = 0.800 (95% CI 0.40–1.00, p < 0.001), sensitivity 1.00, and specificity 0.80 (Fig. 5 ).

A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the performance of preoperative NRI and dSMI in mortality prediction was quite significant (AUC: 0.63, P < 0.001) and the combination of clinical factors enhanced the predictive accuracy to the AUC of 0.90 ( P < 0.001).

In the chronic phase, VA differences became quite significant ( p < 0.001) with an average VA of 0.75 Snellen in Group 2.

When decade of music was included in the analysis, a linear contrast found a quite significant decreasing effect of birth cohort [ F (1,54) = 10.9, p = 0.0017] on how much they were listening to music alone.

Our results showed that there is a direct and moderate relation between the expression of these two genes, so that by increasing the expression of each, the expression of the other one also increases, which is quite significant (r= 0.3, P = 0.002).

coli challenge was quite significant (Pearson's r = 0.73, n = 14, p = 0.003), but not for S. aureus challenge (Pearson's r = 0.4166, n = 14, p = 0.1384).

In fact, among female patients alone the creatinine change from HCV to HCC is quite significant ( p =0.003, Supplemental Tables S3 & S4 and Figure S8 ).

Lastly, in Table 6 , we found that the dynamic squat and hand plank exercises showed a quite significant difference in activation of the EO muscle regarding the context ( p = 0.003; η2 p = 0.336 and p = 0.008; η2 p = 0.296).

The effect of food level variation was quite significant ( F 1,33 = 9.68, p < 0.004), while the effect of variation between densities was not ( F 1,33 = 1.59).