Barely Significant
← all phrases

“quasi-significant”

79 sentences · 79 papers · 105 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

quasi-significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Furthermore, it should be noted that the analysis of the timeframe of the measure was quasi-significant ( p = .07), showing that studies assessing the prevalence of consuming alcohol before or during sex in timeframes from one to 6 months reported a lower prevalence (24.45%; 95% CI: 14.23%, 38.69%) than studies without timeframes or indicated timeframes in excess of six months (40.51%; 95% CI: 30.34%, 51.58%) (Table 4 ).
quasi-significantp = 0.0911.8× alphagold
The results of the mixed ANOVA obtained to analyse the learning curve in the IGT showed a quasi-significant interaction parameter IGT-by-Group ( F (3.42;488.5) = 2.02, p = 0.091, η 2 = 0.014; Greenhouse–Geisser adjusted) as well as a main effect of the IGT-block ( F (3.42;488.5) = 2.65, p = 0.041, η 2 = 0.018).
quasi-significantp < 0.12.0× alphagold
Table 2 shows the results of multiple logistic regression analysis with type 1 diabetes being the dependent variable and parameters which were significant or quasi-significant ( p < 0.1) in univariate analysis entered as co-variates.
quasi-significantp < 0.12.0× alphagold
europaea , a species associated with mature stands, showed a quasi-significant ( p < 0.1) positive effect from selection thinning, and Sylvia cantillans seemed to have increased after thinning (the species was recorded in four points in 2018, vs. only two points in 2015), though analyses did not show significant effects.
quasi-significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
Pathways analyses Separate path analyses (for men and women) were obtained through the next procedure: (a) firstly a complete path-diagram structure with all the variables considered in the correlational analysis (Table 2 ) was tested; (b) next, all non-significant coefficients were deleted to achieve a more parsimonious model; (c) fitting indexes for the finalistic model containing only significant coefficients ( p < 0.05) or quasi-significant coefficients ( p < 0.10) were obtained; and (d) the final model coincided with the finalistic model in the case of adequate goodness-of-fit, while a reviewed model was tested in the case of non adequate fitting.