“practically significant”

Again, why should not a feature this practically significant be included among our primary considerations?

Prior to the DoE and execution, the scientist should clearly define how much variability in particle size distribution is considered practically significant, in that the variability over this predetermined range would likely have an impact on drug product quality.

In both models, the estimates for the interactions of CoP by PR Left and CoP by PR Right were at least 43% of the magnitude of the CoP estimate, which makes these effects practically significant in addition to their p values indicating statistical significance.

While the control group displayed relatively stable levels of wellbeing between the pretest and posttest measurements—with an effect size of d = 0.00 indicating a complete absence of change—participants in the intervention group experienced a meaningful increase in positive psychological functioning following regular participation in physical activity, with a within-group effect size of d = 0.93 indicating a large and practically significant improvement.

However, in many practically significant contexts – such as solid-state dewetting, catalysts, micropatterned surfaces, pores in a sintered materials – a crystal may be attached to one or more interfaces.

Therefore, with an effect size of 7.2 and a statistical power of 82%, the results presented are supported as statistically and practically significant.

Based on guidelines for interpreting Bayes factors ( 55 ), BF ROPE values > 3 provide substantial evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis (i.e., the parameter value is large enough to be practically significant), whereas BF ROPE values < 1/3 provide substantial evidence in favor of the interval null hypothesis (i.e., the parameter of interest is so small that it is practically equivalent to zero).

In part, we were motivated to explore this effect by our recent findings that the BDDME exhibits a more robust and consistent response to 5-HT than DA, which is practically significant due to serotonin’s roles in neuropsychiatric disease states ( Figure 4 D and Figure S3 ) [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ].

Finally, conducting a truly comprehensive review of the literature regarding racial identity in adult education might prove valuable to understand where the field currently stands and what is required to advance this intellectually and practically significant line of research.

For better results, a practically significant threshold of factor loadings should be greater than 0.5 [ 35 ].

This result is both theoretically and practically significant.

However, within a single receptive field, its connection scheme shares similarities with conventional SOMs, making it practically significant when compared to other FPGA-based SOM training studies.

As discussed above, evaluating the electrochemical performance with a high-voltage ester-based electrolyte is more practically significant.

The most practically significant implications of these findings concern the sequencing and emphasis of different types of self-narrative in coaching conversations.

Therefore, the results of theoretical studies, carried out by the mentioned authors, did not end with any practically significant conclusions and it did not lead to the development of certain principles and designs of SE on acoustic waves.

Moreover, the Smallest Worthwhile Change (SWC) was computed as 2.19, reflecting the minimum performance change considered practically significant.

These represent medium effects ( Cohen, 1988 ) and are considered practically significant ( What Works Clearinghouse, 2023 ).

With difficult intellective tasks, there is a robust and practically significant impact of algorithmic appreciation.

Mean ratings were nearly identical, on average, between community and academic partners and were not statistically or practically significant—as such those data are not presented.

As it was cautioned that statistical significance was sensitive to sample size and the effects should not be evaluated simply based on statistical significance, the significant group differences were further investigated by examining the size of the effect estimates to determine if the effects were practically significant or could be ignored because the size of the effect would have no appreciable bearing on the interpretation of group differences [ 89 ].

Although this observation is interesting in itself, given that the pathway that PSC influences work engagement through job demands is not assumed in the extended JD‐R model 1 and that the specific mediation effect of psychological demands is quite small compared to that of job resources (see Table 3 and Appendix 3 ), the mediation effect of psychological demands in the association of perceived PSC with work engagement may not be practically significant.

The difference in the increase between THEP and PHEPP, though statistically significant in our study, is not clinically or practically significant, THEP having an increase of 7 while the increase in PHEPP is 6 points.

Furthermore, the research was practically significant if the overall correlation coefficient reached the researchers’ expectations.

A statistically and practically significant difference was found between the mean scores of participants with midwifery clinical experience of between 6 and 10 years, on the one hand, and those of the group with more than 10 years’ experience in labelling the CTG paper, on the other hand.

This was since factor loadings of 0.50 or greater were “practically significant” for a sample size of 100 [ 28 ].