Barely Significant
← all phrases

“practically significant”

1,559 sentences · 1,559 papers · 1,897 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Furthermore, the causationist standpoint assumes that the technology of interest has a substantive influence on the outcome of interest that is practically significant and on equal footing to other aspects of a child’s life ( Grimes et al., 2008 ).
The Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics.
Perspect Psychol Sci · 2020 · PMC7477771
In applied sports cardiology, a “medium” effect size (e.g., η 2 around 0.06) denotes a practically significant, marked difference in outcomes (like heart adaptation or training response) from an intervention, while a “small” effect size (e.g., η 2 around 0.01) indicates a statistically significant but clinically less important, minor change, frequently requiring larger groups or longer studies to identify reliably or justify major changes in practice.
Numerical simulations In the numerical examples, we will inspect the solution errors of the enhanced accuracy compact scheme designed on smoothing quasi-variable grid topology for some practically significant variable coefficient elliptic equations exhibiting parallel or boundary layer character.
57 Assessment of Practical Significance Statistically, practical significance for group differences was estimated by evaluating the pooled effect size against the recommended minimum effect size representing a practically significant effect for social science data, g = 0.41. 58 Publication Bias Publication bias was not evaluated given the small number of studies that met inclusion criteria and were able to be pooled.
The novel finding of increased WB sweat electrolyte concentrations in the present study, although not surprising, is practically significant, since the WBW method provides a more direct measurement to calculate athletes’ total sweat electrolyte losses (when coupled with WBSR) and better informs intake strategies than REG measurements.
While the control group displayed relatively stable levels of wellbeing between the pretest and posttest measurements—with an effect size of d = 0.00 indicating a complete absence of change—participants in the intervention group experienced a meaningful increase in positive psychological functioning following regular participation in physical activity, with a within-group effect size of d = 0.93 indicating a large and practically significant improvement.