“only marginally significant”

Total predation during the early milky ripening stage (mean = 37.8% per day, SD = 9.0% per day, n = 11) was significantly higher than any other phases (Tukey's t test, p < .001–.05) excluding maize ripening, which was only marginally significant (Tukey's t test, p < .1).

For low RetirPlan, an unexpected increase in RetirIntent was also observed, although it was only marginally significant [ F (1,203) = 2.72, p = 0.10].

Due to data scatter, the further increase in Ca2+, between 1 and 5 min of incubation, is only marginally significant (P < 0.1). .

Yet, for men the inclusion of SRH leads to an only marginally significant improvement (p < 0.10).

Only development of hyperglycemia during everolimus treatment showed significant correlation with a favorable PFS (HR, 0.57; p=0.025), while anemia was only marginally significant (HR, 0.65; p=0.101) ( Table 5 ).

When focusing on BAT-candidates, we found that 18 candidates were in the top of expression of the studies considered, being this number only marginally significant (p = 1.01 × 10 –01 ; 95 CI 9.95 × 10 –02 –1.03 × 10 –01 ).

The interaction term between stress and emotional eating was only marginally significant χ 2 (1) = 2.66, p = 0.102.

Children with biogas stoves at baseline had an adjusted RR of 1.97 (95% CI: 1.10, 3.52), whereas those with woodburning or other stoves at baseline had an RR of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.76), though this difference was only marginally significant (interaction p = 0.1022 ) ( Table 3 ).

This variable is only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.103) in Equation 4 from Table 4 .

The comparison between the two conditions proved that even if subjective measures recorded a two times higher effect size than objective measures, the difference was only marginally significant, QB(1) = 2.65, p = 0.104 (RQ2) ( Table 3 ).

A similar, but only marginally significant association (ρ coeff. = −0.024, p = 0.105) was found with distance to nearest pulp mill.

In this case, the association is only marginally significant (mean r = 0.572, t s = 1.363, 8 d.f., one-tailed p = 0.105 for the standard tests, and mean r = 0.457, t s = 1.780, 8 d.f., one-tailed p = 0.056 for the non-standard tests), but still supports the trend for increasingly positive epistasis with increasing average fitness loss.

N400 Despite the appearance of an N400 effect for Plausibility in the ERP waveforms, our initial model results indicated this effect was only marginally significant (β = − 0.51 μV, SE = 0.32, Z = − 1.61, p = 0.106).

However, among the prime-aged sample the results are different: moving into a multigenerational household without children decreases the risk of housing hardship among prime-aged adults but is only marginally significant (p = 0.106), providing limited support that multigenerational living arrangement may benefit the prime-aged while disadvantaging older adults.

However, the association between the differences in HFS and SDI was only marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.088, P = 0.106). 3.5 Between-gender differences The prevalence of ideal CVH was 0.45% (95% CI: 0.26%, 0.64%) among men, and 1.68% (95% CI: 1.38%, 1.98%) among women.

Notably, the regression coefficient for the interaction of value difference and the high certainty indicator (i.e., the increase in choice precision between low and high value certainty trials) was positive but only marginally significant (mean beta2 = 0.042, p = 0.108) (see Figure 7 ).

This correlation was only marginally significant for HAZ scores (β = −0.20, 95% CI = −0.44 to 0.04, p = 0.108) but not significant for BAZ ( p = 0.622).

However, the effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.108) once the other statistically significant variables in the model were taken into consideration.

Next, most visual pattern independent variables were not statistically significant, except the PLAND of blue-class for the EEG.Ex model, which was only marginally significant (at p = 0.108).

Effects For behavioral concerns, incremental effects were only marginally significant in Miami (p=0.110) at 5 years follow-up, and not significant in LA (p=0.267), showing that 9.5% of families in Miami reported severe behavioral problems relative to comparison families [ 47 ].

We also observed a strong positive correlation between the rarefied ARG richness and the antibiotic usage rates for the WHO statistics for ARG_cluster95 ( r = 0.86, p = 0.0063) although for the CDDEP it was only marginally significant (see Fig. 2 e-f: r = 0.57, p = 0.11).

We also found that mN − mS was greater at the anchor residues of HLA-B–restricted epitopes (median = −0.2%) than in an equivalent random sample of codon positions from HIV-1 RT on average (median = −0.4%), but this difference was only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.11).

However, Bonferroni post-hoc tests revealed that specific group contrasts were only marginally significant ( p = .11–.17).

The observed results from 147 mutational events originating from 47 irradiated mice were in the direction of the expectation: 43% singles, 44% doubles, and 13% triples or more, but the difference was only marginally significant when the results were dichotomized into {1, 2+}, (chi-sq [ 1 ] = 2.52, p = 0.11).

With or without controls, the only marginally significant heat treatment effect is on spite ( P ≤ 0.11 ), where heat stress slightly reduces instances of spitefulness.