Barely Significant
← all phrases

“only marginally significant”

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp = 0.04360.9× alphagold
We found only marginally significant differences in niche breadths between the lineages ( F m = 3.3, p = 0.0436); the Orange lineage has a broader niche than the Red lineage ( p = 0.0335), while the other pairs are statistically comparable.
only marginally significantp < 0.0440.9× alphagold
As expected, due to lack of recombination in males, the trimmed (non‐recombining) sequence length was larger for X‐linked than autosomal loci (4001.89 and 3047.67 respectively, t = 3.5, p < 0.001); the difference was only marginally significant for the original total sequence length (4800.1 and 4730.7, respectively, t = 2.1, p < 0.044).
only marginally significantP = 0.0440.9× alphagold
Inversely, haplotype AGA was significantly associated with a higher risk of severe acne vulgaris in male patients (OR = 1.822, P = 0.002), and haplotype AGA also affected risk in the whole patient group, but the P value was only marginally significant (OR = 1.350, P = 0.044), and this positive association disappeared after Bonferroni correction.
only marginally significantp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
In the best-fitting model for gnat2:mYFP-2A-trβ2;mpv17 −/− adults, the long-wavelength R1 cone (Vr575) contributes the largest amplitude signal with the R2 amplitude (Vr556) being only 22% as large, significantly less than R1 ( t (2748) = 5.23, p = 2.6 × 10 −17 ), and the gnat2:trβ2 R1 amplitudes are only marginally significant ( t (1375) = 2.02, p = 0.044; Fig. 10 C ).
only marginally significantp -value = 0.0450.9× alphagold
However, the association between continuous variables of total PA and the risk of MACEs was only marginally significant in males [adjusted OR = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94~1.00), p -value = 0.045] after adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.
only marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
However, this difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.046, Mann–Whitney U-test, not corrected for multiple testing), and, more importantly, thresholds obtained from the psychometric curve tests did not differ significantly between tinnitus and control participants both at f tp (63.6 ± 19.7 vs. 61.2 ± 16.9 dB SPL; p = 0.70, t-test) and at 0.6 oct below f tp (49.9 ± 16.9 vs. 39.6 ± 15.6 dB SPL; p = 0.065, t-test).