“only marginally significant”

A similar trend was observed in the Korean subsample, though this sex difference was only marginally significant ( p <.10).

Groups with DM tended to have a longer latency, smaller amplitude, and a lower CV compared to groups without DM, but these differences were only marginally significant ( p <0.1).

WBC count, hemoglobin, AST, and ALT were also all higher in the LKD patients, but the differences were only marginally significant (p>0.1).

Finally, self-efficacy has a positive effect on individual resilience (b = 0.552; p < 0.010), but the indirect effect on team resilience is only marginally significant (b = 0.111; p < 0.100).

However, in this study, there was a significant difference of changes in SD between the semaglutide and DPP-4 inhibitors groups, but the difference in CV changes was only marginally significant (p < 0.1).

Indices formulated using green and red bands, GR, NDVIg and OSAVIg showed significant correlation ( P < 0.01) with CCI at anthesis and final grain filling, whereas the correlation between the indices GR and NDVIg with CCI at the initial grain filling stage was only marginally significant (r = 0.56, P < 0.10).

The slope was positive for immigrant students, although only marginally significant (γ13 = 0.06, p < 0.1), indicating that these students had similar falls in academic self-concept to Spanish students.

However, these were only marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, Table 3 ).

The differences between NODF observed and expected values, however, were only marginally significant for all ordering variables in both periods (p < 0.10).

The overall CSE was only marginally significant (previous × current trial congruency interaction: F [1, 9] = 3.3, p = 0.10), with numerically smaller conflict scores following incongruent (mean = 80 ms) than congruent trials (mean = 60 ms) (see Figure 3 A).

(2004) report significant differentiation ( P < 0.01) in microsatellite DNA within the Stikine, Nass, and Skeena rivers, but only marginally significant differentiation ( P < 0.10) among sea/river-type populations within the Alsek and Taku drainages.

Figure 1 D shows a negative influence of one trial back, only marginally significant after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.1, logBF = 0.49).

Between-within mean differences among groups were only marginally significant, either for left acromion-to-bed distance [ F (1, 87, 184.80) = 2.86, p < 0.10; partial η 2 = 0.03; Cohen’s d = 0.34] and for right acromion-to-bed [ F (2, 176) = 2.68, p < 0.10; partial η 2 = 0.03; Cohen’s d = 0.34].

The correlation between the two subgroups is however only marginally significant [ rs (77) = 0.19, p < 0.1].

However, the between-within subject effect was only marginally significant for the distance between the right acromion to base (F (1.83, 177.78) = 2.67, p < 0.10) but full significance was achieved for the distance between the left acromion to base (F (1.80, 164.54) = 4.27, p < 0.05).

For health, at wave 0 men with poor self-rated health whose health subsequently improved drank less, while women whose health deteriorated drank more, though these coefficients were only marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Greenfinches ( Carduelis chloris ) and tree sparrows also showed higher population densities in 2010 but differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10; Fig. 4 ).

Women age 35 and above had twice the odds of inconsistently reporting that they experienced a post-partum complication relative to women age 15–24, although the value is only marginally significant (OR: 2.03, p < .10).

Respondents in the middle quintile also had lower odds of borrowing, although the effect was only marginally significant (Model 1 OR = 0.587; 95% CI: 0.323–1.068; p < 0.10).

A higher increase in valence was associated with lower subsequent intention, although the between-person effect was only marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Trust in government is positively associated with both outcomes, although the association is only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) for value alignment among UK respondents.

However, this difference was only marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Yet, only marginally significant mediation effects were examined for Reading (Model 4 in Table 4 ) with students' school identification ( b = 7.15, p < 0.10) and their perceptions of school climate (indirect effect, b = 7.87, p < 0.10).

However, the association between groups by institutional situation and latent profile was only marginally significant X2 (3) = 6.1, p = 0.10.

Further, nectar tube width and stamen length increased by ~11 and 6 %; however, this effect was only marginally significant (see Supporting Information Table S1 , P < 0.1).