“only marginally significant”

The only difference was that for children who scored in the upper half at T1, the reduction in sympathy from T1 to T2 was only marginally significant, p = .091.

However when considering the data from all participants (both strong learners and weak learners) differences in reaction times were only marginally significant ( F (1, 17) = 3.19, p = 0.092).

Results were virtually the same for all analyses (except for the interaction between prudence and political ideology, which when using probit turns only marginally significant, P = 0.092).

While this may seem surprising, in the supraliminal training phase the same participants were only marginally significant faster in the future condition (M = 0.57 seconds, SD = 0.11) than in the control condition (M = 0.59 seconds, SD = 0.12) (t(18) = 1.78, p = .092, d = 0.42).

Comparing the scale scores within each condition, we find that the difference between moral and causal code misalignment scores was significant in the causal code condition, Δ = 1.93, t (38) = 12.338, p < 0.001, but only marginally significant in the moral code condition, Δ = 0.28, t (55) = −1.715, p = 0.092.

In addition, rated mood correlated positively with rated health, although this relationship was only marginally significant ( p = .093).

Perceiving women in general as more electable was also positively associated with being more likely to intend to vote for Warren, though this effect was only marginally significant: b = 0.07 and P = 0.093.

Contrastingly, transfecting HEa miRNA antagomirs increased invasion in the context of 320 mg/dl ethanol co-exposure, although this effect was only marginally significant (t(14) = 1.805, P = 0.093, Fig 7B ).

In the subset of mosquitoes used in the morphometric and CHC analyses, however, the difference was only marginally significant ( P <0.093, N =34, one-way Wilcoxon test; Fig. 7 A), probably reflecting the smaller sample size.

This effect was highly significant on repeat trials [ F (3, 45) = 10.5, p < 0.001] but only marginally significant for switch trials [ F (3, 45) = 2.3, p = 0.093].

The within-subject effect for condition was only marginally significant, however, for the ratings taken directly after the musical stimulation [ F (3, 120) = 2.190, p = 0.093].

We found that subjects who received the descriptive norms intervention reported somewhat lower perceived risk than those in the control, although this result is only marginally significant (standardized coefficient = –0.160; 95% CI, –0.35, 0.026; P = 0.093) ( SI Appendix , Table D.1 ).

This relationship was, however, only marginally significant (R 2 = 0.152, p = 0.093).

Patients with a frequently-visited physician tended to have delayed times to starting insulin (average 864.34 days) compared to those without a frequently-visited physician (average 821.18 days), although this was only marginally significant (P = 0.0935).

There was a slightly greater difference in the JP4-039/G-CSF group over the control, but only marginally significant (coef = 0.170, p-value = 0.0936).

Our study is the first longitudinal study in support of poor emotion regulation leading to higher chances of parental digital emotion regulation, although the association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.094).

As hypothesized, parity was inversely associated with maternal total blood As ( r = −0.22, p = 0.025), but after adjustment for water As, this association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.094).

The overall mean activation-deactivation values for angular and curved shapes (test value = 0) demonstrated that in energizing condition, the effects were only marginally significant for angular ( p = .094) and curved ( p = .074); in calming condition, the calming effect for curved pills ( p < .001) and for angular pills ( p < .001) were significant.

The correlation between serum TSH and BMI percentiles was strongly significant in girls (r=0.330, p=0.001), while in boys, this correlation was only marginally significant (r=0.250, p=0.094).

8.7%, p = 0.016), while the same was only marginally significant among boys (33.8% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.094).

The multivariate ordination of data showed that the composition of herb communities differed between granites and basalts, but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.094); the species composition of shrubs did not differ between the two bedrocks ( p = 0.13).

Second, in the full genetic model the effects of longitude on days to bolting and days to flowering were only marginally significant ( P = 0.094, and P = 0.064, respectively; Table 4 ), although both were significant in the reduced, geographic models (Models A and B; all P < 0.020).

However, the interaction between independence and frequency was only marginally significant (z = 1.67, p = 0.094; see Figure 6 ).

The observed conditioned food-cup approach in Orienters-No Retrieval group during Test 1 was only marginally significant compared to its own food-cup behavior seen at the end of extinction ( p = 0.094), but was significantly different (without correcting for multiple comparisons) from the food-cup behavior seen in Nonorienters-No Retrieval group at Test 1 ( p = 0.047).

Although processing speed scores improved from T2 to T3, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.094).