“only marginally significant”

This effect was only marginally significant (p=0.09) likely due to considerable intertumoral heterogeneity in response to RCT as suggested by shallow dose–response curve (Figure 4 b).

DIC fluxes tended to increase with oyster biomass, but were only marginally significant (p = 0.09, R 2 = 0.31; Fig 4B ).

Nonetheless, a noteworthy problem is ignorance, as indicated by the agreement of 70% of Fogera farmers and 57% of Mecha farmers, a difference that is only marginally significant ( p = 0.09).

The incidence rates of muscle ache and vomiting were similar between patients who died and who recovered; these differences were only marginally significant ( P =.09 and P =.07, respectively).

Post-hoc Tukey tests indicated the following pattern of findings in children's proportion of category-match choices: 5-year-old children made significantly more category-match choices than both 4-year-olds and 3-year-olds (both ps < 0.05), 4-year-old children also made more category-match choices than 3-year-old children but this difference was only marginally significant, p = 0.09.

Under the selected field condition (RC3), only two pathologists provided counts that were more than 10 CBs from the overall mean, although the overall differences across RCs were only marginally significant ( P = 0.09).

The difference between the horizontal-hands (set 8: M = 2.61, SD = 1.22; set 12: M = 1.61, SD = 1.13) and the hands-off condition was only marginally significant under set 8 ( p = .09) and was not significant under set 12 ( p = .66).

Moreover, a separate analyses of the Mixed tasks showed that the interaction of decision task by outcome valence was only marginally significant [ F (1, 54) = 3.00, p = 0.09].

Finally, the 3-way interaction between WP governmental trust, time, and manipulation was in the correct direction (specifically, indicating more decrease over time of the covariance for the experimental group than the control group, which instead increased, as illustrated in Fig 5 ), but only marginally significant (γ 113 = -0.06, t (255) = 1.71, p = .09) ( S2 File , Note N).

Subjects with non-paralytic lagophthalmos improved from a mean pre-placement IPFD of 3.6 mm to a mean post-placement IPFD of 1.2 mm, although this difference was only marginally significant (P = 0.09).

The impact of coffee consumption on DM risk was only marginally significant (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07, p=0.09).

Unadjusted survival models (Table 3 ) indicated a lower hazard of PPFP adoption among women exposed to RC, but this result was only marginally significant (hazard ratio (HR): 0.79, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–1.04, p = 0.09).

33 Although the association was only marginally significant for the South, the association was in the same direction as that for the Midwest (adjusted PR=1.12; 95% CI=0.98, 1.29; p =0.09).

The ANCOVA analysis on the percentage of correct responses on the digit span task, using mean PTAs as covariate, the results showed only marginally significant differences between the 4 age groups, F (3, 79) = 2.20, MSE = 118.31, p = .09.

The index of moderated mediation was only marginally significant, ß = 0.03, SE = 0.02, z = 1.71, p = .09, 95% CI = [-0.003, 0.06].

Visual target presentation suppressed activations in the left precuneus, but this effect was only marginally significant when corrected for multiple comparisons within the entire brain ( p = 0.09; [x = -14, y = -60, z = 42]; peak t-value: 4.91, number of voxels in cluster: 666).

The difference between 8- and 6-year-old children is only marginally significant (6 y/o–8 y/o: B = 0.44, z = 1.70, p = 0.090).

In univariable MR, genetically higher serum 25(OH)D levels were positively associated with AMM in all participants ( β = 0.049, SE = 0.024, p = 0.039) and males ( β = 0.057, SE = 0.025, p = 0.021), but only marginally significant in females ( β = 0.043, SE = 0.025, p = 0.090) based on IVW models was noticed.

Particularly, we focused on the novel Hispanic-specific ALL risk signal at ERG locus, observing only marginally significant association of this SNP with ALL susceptibility in childhood patients [ P = 0.09, OR = 1.17 (0.98–1.40)], but not adults ( P = 0.76).

We also observed a positive relationship between DEA and root biomass, but the correlation was only marginally significant [ R 2 = 0.20; F (1, 13) = 3.3, P = 0.09; Figure 5C ].

These results were only marginally significant due to decreased sample sizes (binomial p = 0.09, N = 201 and p = 0.06, N = 185, for females and males, respectively).

The difference in probability of choosing the common number between the Wait and NoWait treatments becomes only marginally significant (logit coeff. 0.15, z = 1.34, one-tailed p = 0.09) when dropping the participants who chose the common number in zero periods.

Moreover, 2 studies were considered as having a partial effect, 1 reported controller medication adherence improved significantly from baseline for the subgroup of subjects with low (<75%) adherence on the intervention group only but also reported no significant differences in change between the intervention group and control group ( P =.10) [ 61 ]; the other study [ 57 ] described their result as only marginally significant ( P =.09; see Table 1 ).

In addition to this seasonal trend, the dietary LMM suggests that caracals feeding on more wetland‐adapted prey have enriched δ 13 C signatures, although this is only marginally significant ( β = 2.09 ± 1.26, p = 0.09; see Figure 6A ).

36 ] while incongruent trials showed only marginally significant reduction [ F ( 1 , 26 ) = 3 . 04 p < 0 . 09 , η 2 = 0 . 10 ; see Table 3 and Supplementary Table S2 ].