“only marginally significant”

The association in Wave 3 was only marginally significant ( p = 0.088); however, the direction of the association remained consistent and the lack of significance was likely due to attrition of participants across waves.

On day 28, after wounding, the VEGF protein level in the wound tissue was lower in the untreated diabetic rats compared to the untreated controls, although it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.088).

A similar observation (though only marginally significant, with p = 0.088) was made also for the data set as a whole, but the slopes were not significantly different between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants of M. sativa ( p = 0.30).

The effect of tree richness on overall fungal community composition was only marginally significant ( p =0.088 in a permutational ANOVA) and explained 1.1% of the total variation. 3.3.

In the analysis of time alone, the positive linear increase across time became only marginally significant (β = 0.02, p = 0.0884) after adjusting for a significant positive AR1 autocorrelative term (β = 0.8716, p<0.0001; the Durbin-Watson test of lag 1 autocorrelation was significant before adjusting for the AR1, but not after); the autocorrelation term absorbed much of the variance due to the deviation from a straight-line trend.

Opposite (i.e., positive), but only marginally significant association ( p = 0.0887) was found also for ERVV-1, showing higher expression levels in positive samples (only in case of 20% cut-off).

The effect of end-of-life status on acute care and on informal personal care was no longer significant, and the effect on professional home care was only marginally significant (p = 0.089).

However, this result was only marginally significant ( F -test, p = 0.089, Supplementary Table S5 ) and once again the statistical significance was lost at 28 dpa ( Supplementary Table S6 ), even though the ratio in expression levels remained at approximately 10:1.

The estimated difference between Afromestizo and Mestizo configurations is positive but only marginally significant (difference = 0.13, SE = 0.08, p = 0.089), while contrasts between Afromestizo and Mulato configurations are small and statistically indistinguishable from zero ( p = 0.38).

In the first case, the perceived success of the student movement moderates the effect of reported current participation of the students (quasi experimental condition) over their intentions of participating in both normative and non-normative actions, although in the former the effect is only marginally significant, F (2,375) = 2.44, p = 0.089, η p 2 = 0.014 and F (2,375) = 3.29, p = 0.038, η p 2 = 0.018, respectively.

Cannabis use was only marginally significant (OR=0.46, 95 % CI=0.19, 01.13, p-value=0.089) in the model fit without Polysubstance use ( Table 2 ), and there was a highly significant correlation between Cannabis use and Polysubstance use (p-value<2.2e-16).

However, because of the reduction in statistical power associated with the between-subjects design, smaller number of subjects per condition, and increased response variance in this experiment, the main effect of spectral content was only marginally significant in this model, χ 2 (1) = 2.89, p = 0.0890.

Although only marginally significant, the greater the amount of time a person spent walking through River’s Edge, the greater the observed decrease in cortisol (F 1,178 = 2.92, p = 0.089).

Mean development time for larvae that reached the pupal phase was fastest on diet 3 ( Table 1 ), but differences between diets were only marginally significant ( F = 25.077; df = 2; P = 0.089).

The association was only marginally significant in Model 3 for RWT ( p = 0.089) and in Model 2 for LVMI ( p = 0.054), and was fully attenuated in Model 3 for LVMI ( p = 0.260).

For wheezing frequency (Model 1), the association with each exposure is generally in the anticipated direction but is only marginally significant for last-minute timing changes (8 percentage points, p =.089).

However, tissue p16 expression was only marginally significant for the PFS ( p = 0.089, Figure 4 D).

Similarly, the correlation between max intensity of AU23 and lateral acceleration speed was only marginally significant ( r =.38, p =.089) for the expressive suppression group.

bicolor infestation compared with the control logs without a lure, although the effect was only marginally significant ( P = 0.089).

PP differences in durations across swimming tasks might account for the trend in the MANOVA model, albeit the difference between the two MI APNEA durations was only marginally significant when corrections for multiple comparisons were applied ( M = 2.07 s, SD = 3.47, p = .09), see Figure 2 .

When amusics were identified using the contour subtest of the MBEA, their performance in the low-pass filtered condition was still below that of controls (amusics mean = 62%, SD = 16%; controls mean = 70%, SD = 12%); however the difference was only marginally significant [ t (38) = 1.7, p = 0.09].

When we rerun the analysis only for those studies where results were not rated as having a high risk of bias, the overall average effect on time studying is larger in magnitude but less precise and only marginally significant ( SMD ^ Low or med BOB = 0 . 17 ; 95 % CI: − 0 . 03 to 0 . 38 ; p = 0 . 09 ; k = 3 ).

For the model based on Roma girls, the statistical test on ρ was only marginally significant at the 10 % level ( p = 0.09, outside the conventional threshold of p = 0.05).

Moreover, the 4-month-old 3xTg-AD animals spent more time with self-grooming than the controls, however, the difference was only marginally significant (F(1,14) = 3,28; p = 0.09, Figure 2 B).

For second-line drugs, the ensemble model (91.8% [89.6–94.0%]) outperformed MD-CNN (90.3% [87.9–92.7%]), although this result was only marginally significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR p = 0.09).