“only marginally significant”

However, after adjusting for UACR reduction, the direct effect remained only marginally significant (β = 5.88; 95% CI: –0.50 to 10.74; P = 0.080), and the path from UACR reduction to eGFR change was not significant (β = 0.00; 95% CI: –0.04 to 0.04; P = 0.871).

Sessions with more neurons showing task rule modulation tended to show lower subspace overlap, but this correlation was modest and only marginally significant (r = -0.32, p = 0.08, Pearson correlation, n = 31 sessions).

sample, r = 0.13, ns ( n = 64), and only marginally significant for the Filipino sample, r = 0.22, p = 0.08 ( n = 62).

Break in available nitrate panel is from 6 to 15 μg N g soil −1 and the two asterisks in panel B indicate that the pairwise comparisons between letters b and c are only marginally significant, p < 0.08).

Those who used more products with antimicrobials had less prudent attitudes (-2.0%), although this was only marginally significant in the full model (p = 0.08, see Table 3 in S1 Text ).

However, self‐efficacy was only marginally significant [OR: 1.15 (0.98–1.33), P = 0.08].

However, the significance level was not sufficient enough for any of them and only marginally significant for ORAC results correlated to fucoxanthin ( p = 0.08), suggesting that the antioxidant activity is the response of a mixture of compounds and their different antioxidant modes of action. 3.

By contrast, in the Opposite Perspective condition, the pattern was reversed, though only marginally significant, with the majority (60%) of participants placing the “good” animal on their left (i.e., on Bob’s right: 51 left = good vs. 34 right = good, sign test p = 0.08).

Although the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08) in June and non‐significant in other months (Figure 2a ), the same sign of effect sizes is a clue of a non‐random pattern.

Whereas the low autonomy slope was significantly positive, t (439) = 7.39, p < .001, the high autonomy slope was only marginally significant, t (439) = 1.74, p = .08.

When this support fell, levels of stress rose but the change was only marginally significant ( p < 0.08).

Logistic regression analysis found this effect only marginally significant (odds ratio = 0.77, z = –1.77, P = .08) when controlling for the highly significant effect of numeracy (odds ratio = 1.52 per step on the 1–6 scale, z = 5.17, P < .001).

However, this result was only marginally significant ( B = 0.28, P = .08).

The same factors were prognostic for RFS ( P ≤ 0.04), except for high age and weight loss, which were only marginally significant ( P ≤ 0.08).

4 ), whereas differences among N addition treatments were only marginally significant at Norrliden ( P = 0.08).

There were only marginally significant differences between TD males and females in the anterior frontal and superior parietal regions ( P = 0.08).

It is important to note that CBASP revealed clear benefits in self‐reported depression (BDI; g = 0.85, SE = 0.38, CI 95 [0.11–1.59], P = 0.03), whereas posttreat comparisons of CBASP and IPT in observer‐rated depression were only marginally significant (HAM‐D; g = 0.66, SE = 0.37, CI 95 [−0.07 to 1.39], P = 0.08).

We observed a slight, (but) only marginally significant, difference between the slopes of neural crest-involved and segmentation defects (t = 1.810, p = 0.08).

Pressure ulcers among high-risk residents followed a similar trend, although pandemic and vaccination-related regression parameters for that QM were only marginally significant (p = .08).

More patients who received upfront steroids had neurologic symptoms at the diagnosis of BM, but this was only marginally significant (68.6% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.08).

Of those previously undiagnosed, 49.6% (95% CI 43.3 to 56.0) had a viral load ≥100,000 copies/mL, a figure higher than among those who were diagnosed but not on ART (40.1%, 95% CI 32.5 to 48.3), although the difference in distribution between those two categories was only marginally significant ( p =0.08).

Likewise, participants decreased their mean bribe level in the low-norm condition, although the change was only marginally significant ( F = 3.08, p = .08, eta 2 = .04).

In our model-based analysis ( Supplementary Table 5 ), the biocrust type treatment was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08), and the only significant pairwise difference between treatments was for moss-lichen biocrusts (μ ± 1 SD = 0.004 ± 0.002 nmol N 2 O m –2 s –1 , n = 20) vs. control samples (difference ± 1 SE = 0.0011 ± 0.0005 nmol N 2 O m –2 s –1 ).

Although this effect was only marginally significant ( P =0.08), it might be specific.

However, the estimated effect difference is only marginally significant from a statistical perspective (p = 0.08) and highly sensitive to model specification.