“only marginally significant”

As expected, the number of possible combinations negatively affected the individuals' ability to find successful combinations, although this effect was only marginally significant (LRT: χ 2 =3.02, d.f.=1, P =0.08, N =431).

On the other hand, women who reported having contraceptive use support from their partners had a reduced risk of discontinuing, relative to women who said their partners did not support their contraceptive use, though this association was only marginally significant (aOR = 0.59, p = 0.08).

A significant difference between groups is observed between the PD-PIGD group and the control group ( p = 0.026), while the difference between the two Parkinson’s groups is only marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

However, given the LMR value of the 5-profile solution was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08), which indicates that this model might not be superior to solutions with lesser profiles, we then carefully examined it in conjunction with the 3-, 4-, and 6-profile solutions.

At plot level, spider abundances also were higher in monospecific spruce than in monospecific beech stands, but this difference was only marginally significant ( F (4) = 2.88, p = 0.08; Fig. 1 c).

For ventral rostral putamen, connectivity strength with inferior frontal gyrus was lower in PD ON than PD OFF but was only marginally significant ( t 24 = 1.81, p = 0.08, Figure S3 D in Supplementary Material).

Indeed, strains that evolved with a competitor had significantly higher growth rates than strains evolved alone ( Fig 4a ), and there was a slight increase in growth plasticity, albeit this effect was only marginally significant (p = 0.08, Table 1 ).

Analysis of simple-main effects of care leaver status for each level of velocity revealed that, after correction for multiple comparisons, the effect of care-leaver status at 3 cm/s was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

In comparison to the baseline model including only intercepts for fixed and random effects, the addition of a fixed effect of piece significantly improved the fit of the models for articulation and velocity ( p < 0.001 in both cases), but was only marginally significant in the case of asynchrony ( p = 0.08).

The association with neuroticism was only marginally significant (β = −0.15, p = 0.08).

Only marginally significant interaction effects were found for frequency of and comfort with sexual orientation disclosure ( b frequency =0.03, p =0.08; b comfort =0.03, p =0.05; Table 4 ).

Within-group comparisons pointed to a greater proportion of processing (sporadic + random errors) than morphosyntactic (consistent + systematic errors) in the control group (Wilcoxon Z = −7.65; p < 0.0001) and a similar profile although only marginally significant for PPA-S (Wilcoxon Z = −1.706; p = 0.08).

The informational message condition also produced a higher mean score in positive MOUD attitude than control, but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = .08).

As expected, results showed that elevated negative affect was associated with more severe paranoid ideation at the next assessment, although this association was only marginally significant ( Negative Affect → Paranoid Ideation: t = 1.85, b = 0.12, SE = 0.06, p = .08).

The difference between losses and neutral outcomes was only marginally significant, b = 1.56, t (202) = 1.74, p = .08.

Nevertheless, when looking at each gender separately the association between hypertension and alcohol or tobacco use was only marginally significant in men with an OR of 1.4 (95% CI: 0.9 to 2.2; p=0.08) and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0 to 2.7; p=0.07), respectively (Table 3 ).

Furthermore, PostC also improved diastolic function, indicated by reduced LV end-diastolic pressure and a blunted reduction of dp/dt min, although the latter effect was only marginally significant (p=0.08).

As hypothesised, participants in the negative in-group condition had a lower rated liking of orange juice than the negative out-group condition [p<0.05] and the neutral in-group condition, although the latter did not survive a Bonferroni correction and was only marginally significant [p = 0.08].

A similar effect of high folate intake on total urinary As was observed in KO male mice exposed to iAs, but this effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08 ; Figure 2A ).

In lower proficiency individuals, the P600 effect was only marginally significant ( Condition : F (1, 26) = 3.39, p = .08; Condition × Ant‐Post : F (3, 78) = 2.28, p = .08, only at Pz : p < .05).

In terms of academic performance, significant improvements in English exam scores for the intervention group were observed at 3‐month follow‐up (estimated mean difference: 4.19, 95% CI: 0.23–8.16, p = .04), but the overall interaction effect was only marginally significant ( p = .08) (Table S1 ).

However, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that high normal FPG was significantly associated with an elevated A1C ( P = 0.003), whereas an ethnicity effect was only marginally significant when adjusted for FPG ( P = 0.08).

PLHIV from households in the richer wealth quintile tended to be more likely to be aware of their serostatus, with an association that was significant in bivariate analysis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35–0.97) but only marginally significant in multivariable analysis (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35–1.07, p = 0.08).

Last, the share of participants who chose the taller person in the photograph when asked about knowledge differed significantly from 50% for children (girls and boys, p<0.001 in both), but only marginally significant for adults (women, p = 0.08; men, p = 0.09).

This effect was significant for all age groups (all p s < .05): accuracy was significantly lower for the FB trials than for the TB trials and the control trials (which included MC and filler trials) in all age groups (all p s < .05), except in the 35–49 group for which the difference between the FB trials and the TB trials was only marginally significant ( p = .08).