“only marginally significant”

We found that this was indeed the case, with the exception of the right CAUD ROI, where the correlation remained only marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

In our analysis, when separating by climate, the correlation between soil biodiversity and multifunctionality was only marginally significant under future climate (R 2 = 0.14, p = 0.065).

We observed a negative, though only marginally significant, trend in the relationship between dominant producer abundance and productivity ( F 1,8 = 4.59, p = .065), while consumer abundance and productivity were positively associated ( F 1,8 = 9.92, p = .013).

The relationship between gender mix and the effectiveness of aspirin in reducing the combined end point of fatal and non-fatal MI was only marginally significant (R 2 = 0.21, p = 0.065).

The correlation with the total IADL-C score was only marginally significant (r = -0.186, df = 98, p < 0.065).

Note that we applied the step-wise analysis even though CC in Epoch 10 (28 ms) was only marginally significant, t (44) = −1.54, p = .065, d = 0.23.

We computed the differences between the observed and optimal outcomes (mean reward when following the ideal allocator) and observed a negative deviation from optimality (mean ± s.d.: –.56 ± 1.30), which was only marginally significant ( t 19 = –1.95, p = .066).

An ANOVA on DU from the speech production task found a significant naming condition effect [ F (1,24) = 344.09, P < 0.001] and interaction effect between condition and group [ F (1,24) = 6.86, P = 0.015], whereas the group main effect was only marginally significant [ F (1,24) = 3.72, P = 0.066].

Overall, a positive profit margin was associated with a higher probability of any PPE shortages, but the association was only marginally significant (marginal effect = −0.9%, P = .066).

The improvement of the model fit due to the inclusion of the quadratic term was not significant for the verbal Stroop effect (Δ F (1,284) = 1.95, corrected p = 0.327) and only marginally significant for the spatial one (Δ F (1,284) = 4.57, corrected p = 0.066), but the increase in R 2 was negligible in both cases (respectively, <0.01 and 0.02).

This correlation was only marginally significant in the ND group ( P =0.066, ANOVA) and absent in the HFD group ( P =0.510, ANOVA).

Amplitude of aware errors was also significantly greater than hits, but only for the left OFC (left OFC1: t(13) = 2.53, p = .025 left OFC2: t(13) = 2.47, p = .028), whereas the right OFC was only marginally significant (right OFC1: t(13) = 2.0, p = .066; right OFC2: t(13) = 2.09, p = .057).

Satisfaction with informal informational and appraisal support, were only marginally significant ( p = 0.066 and 0.068) and underpowered (power = 0.41– 0.48).

Differences in protein depolymerisation rates among plant species were, however, only marginally significant (F 5,24 = 2.41, p = 0.066), if values were calculated per area, considering differences in bulk density and organic horizon depth, and did not show clear moss-shrub contrasts anymore (Table S2).

This result is confirmed by our data, which shows that both the proportion of grasses and SOC tend to increase in more intensive systems compared to less intensive systems, although the relationship is relatively weak (r = 0.280) and only marginally significant ( p = 0.066).

For example, dACC activation in the expectancy of an adult picture > fixation contrast, which was significant in Study 1, was only marginally significant (p = 0.066) in Study 2 ( Fig. 5 B).

As noted in Table 3 , the addition of the type of bereavement (accident, military, terror attack, illness, and other), time since the bereavement, gender, and age as covariates incurred one change in the pattern of results: the significant effect of stress on the likelihood of substance use disorder ( p = .036) became only marginally significant ( p = .066).

post‐MELD survival was only marginally significant (p = 0.066 and p = 0.063; respectively), better short, medium and long‐term post‐LT survival were observed in the post‐MELD period.

This result was, however, only marginally significant ( b = −0.36, p = 0.066).

Additionally the effect of Type was only marginally significant ( df = 47395, P = 0.066) on 1500 Hz stimuli.

In AG if two people showed similar neural patterns in the encoding residual, they were also more likely to tell similar stories (Mean ρ = 0.052, SD = 0.052, z = 2.84, p = 0.004, q = 0.011); The same effect was found in mPFC, but it was only marginally significant (Mean ρ = 0.032, SD = 0.102, z = 1.83, p = 0.066, q = 0.099).

The rate of intraoperative RD was observed in only three cases of ERM, and this result was only marginally significant ( p = 0.066) Patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months (range 6–48 months).

However, this effect was attenuated and only marginally significant in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.002, p = 0.066).

The self-rated rational ability was only marginally significant as a predictor (β = -.15, p = .066).

In contrast to study 1, model II shows a strong bur only marginally significant positive interaction effect between students’ level of burnout and the shades of bribery (burnout × grey: β II = 0.335, p = 0.066; burnout × black: β II = 0.297, p = 0.089).