“only marginally significant”

The odds of an unfavourable TB outcome increased with alcohol use (AOR 1.68; 95% CI: 0.97, 2.89), but this was only marginally significant (p=0.062).

It is worth noting that the difference in identification speed between expected words and new words was only marginally significant ( β = −0.08, SE = 0.04, t = −1.89, p = 0.0623).

Students of other races reported higher odds (AOR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01–1.47), but this was only marginally significant after adjustment for multiple tests (adjusted p = 0.0627).

Both active and sham group subjects had faster Go reaction time following their assigned intervention, but this difference was not significant in the sham group ( p = 0.378, d = 0.515) and was only marginally significant in the active group ( p = 0.063, d = 0.971).

Although the interaction between year and population density was only marginally significant ( β = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.00, 0.05], p = 0.063), it suggests a potential trend in which the increase in fitness center training is somewhat more pronounced in more urban municipalities (see Figure 3 b).

Executive Function A moderate and positive effect was found for active NIBS on executive function, but the effect was only marginally significant ( k = 6, g = 0.318, 95% CI −0.017 to 0.653, p = 0.063; see Figure 6 ).

Thromboembolic events The incidence of thromboembolic events was higher in the no-ablation group, though the difference was only marginally significant (3 [2.1%] vs. 14 [7.2%]; p=0.063).

Facilitation strategies was only marginally significant in the final model (β = 5.7, 95% CI [− 0.31, 11.76], p = 0.063).

The correlation between visual Braille and visual words was higher than the correlation between tactile Braille and visual Words, however this result was only marginally significant (p=0.063).

It is worth noting that patients with insulin resistance have shorter median telomeres by 0.44 compared to those with normal values (β = −.44; 95% CI, −0.91 to 0.02), although it is only marginally significant ( P = .063) as presented in Table 3 .

Interaction between rs174602 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms and low alpha‐linolenic acid/linoleic acid values on LDL‐C was only marginally significant ( P = 0.063).

Although the correlation is only marginally significant for degree (ρ = −0.030, P = 0.063), the 1,467 genes with degree >1 show significantly lower ω values than the 2,401 genes with degree = 1 (median ω values of 0.125 and 0.135, respectively; Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.005).

In this study, the patients with high mtCN in tumor samples tended to have worse overall survival; however, this was only marginally significant ( p = 0.063, Fig. 3 e).

Similarly, during this period, there are no significant differences due to the animacy of the elements in gazes to the agent ( t = 0.67, p = 0.51), and only marginally significant in gazes to the patient ( t = 1.91, p = 0.063), with the IA condition being numerically higher than the other two conditions.

Out‐of‐pocket payments were lower in the North region ($US15.0) than Central ($US25.1) and South ($US26.9); however, difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.063).

However the level of functional constraint is even higher (lower ω) in non- Hox genes than in Hox genes (ω = 0.04156 versus ω = 0.06094, respectively), although differences are only marginally significant (P = 0.063).

The same trend was observed for the category ‘Insecticide target and nervous system’, although this was only marginally significant (corrected p ‐value = 0.063, 2 genes out of 31).

First, in the post hoc pairwise comparisons of advertisement judgments by couple composition, advertisements with heterosexual couples only were rated as significantly more memorable than those with no couples ( p = .034), whereas this difference was only marginally significant in the restricted sample ( p = .063).

Also, the effect of class membership on self-care was only marginally significant, F (3, 99) = 2.51, p = 0.063.

The difference in high-profile (HP) taxa between natural and regulated river sections was only marginally significant ( p = 0.063), with a lower proportion in channelized river sections.

This difference was only marginally significant for the 2013 pre-spray sample (Welch t -test 51.69 = 1.56, p = 0.063) and for the 2014 post-spray sample (Welch t -test 42.3 = 1.47, p = 0.075) ( Figure 4 ).

However, the effect of prolonged Cur + Pip intake on ALT levels was only marginally significant (WMD = −6.68 IU, 95% CI: −13.71 to 0.35, p = 0.063).

With respect to sex, the interaction was only marginally significant at the 7% level (adjusted Wald test, F (1, 3996) = 3.45; p = 0.063), indicating that these data offered no evidence that the reductions in NMPOU were more pronounced in women than in men.

Although the difference was only marginally significant (P = 0.063), those who rated the website most favorably cited more reasons for using it than did others.

In the masking task, the data showed a mid-level hump pattern, although the effect of μ soft was only marginally significant, F (2, 12) = 3.69, p = .063, η 2 p = .38, = .91.