“only marginally significant”

Noteworthily, a negative association (although only marginally significant, p = 0.06) was identified between upstream wetlands and geometric mean concentrations of E. coli for all sampling events.

However, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = .06).

Additionally, our study reported that young age (18–44 years) was associated with increased risk of EPTB as compared to the older age group, although only marginally significant ( P value = 0.06).

PSS: 20.79 kg/m2) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06 ), and the grip force (SSS: 411 N vs.

We also found a two-way interaction between distribution and PPN ( p < .001, η p 2 = 0.04), but the three-way interaction involving sex was only marginally significant ( p = .06, η p 2 < 0.01).

This effect was also significant ( P = 0.046) when including RTs < 300 msec (see Supplemental Material S02 ), but only marginally significant ( P = 0.060) when adding the data of a remaining participant with not-above-chance performance (see Supplemental Material S03 ).

In agreement with previous studies in the maritime Antarctic that have found no influence of soil pH on soil bacterial alpha diversity or community composition 10 , 15 , or in which pH has been identified as an only marginally significant predictor ( P > 0.06) for the frequencies of C and N cycling genes 14 , soil pH had no influence on bacterial alpha or beta diversity in the present study.

Differences in virulence between experiments were only marginally significant ( P = 0.060).

Assessing patients with clear cell histology only ( N =111), similar associations were observed, however, primary tumour in situ was only marginally significant ( P =0.06).

CTL) across all resting-state conditions was only marginally significant (interaction; F 2 , 24 = 3.14 , p = 0.06 , Figure 2a ), there was a significant effect of task on the learning pattern’s CI across the resting-state conditions before and after learning (repeated measured ANOVA (resting-state condition (RS1, RS2) × task (MSL, CTL); F 1 , 12 = 6.99 , p = 0.02 , Figure 2a ).

Although the increase in transcription of tagA/stcE in clade 8 was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06) via microarrays, qRT- PCR detected more than 2-fold upregulation in clade 8 strains ( Table 1 ).

While the overall ANOVA was only marginally significant, F (2,93) = 2.99, p = .06, the planned contrasts revealed that men's ratings in the third condition decreased significantly less than men's ratings in condition 1 and condition 2, t (93) = 2.06, p = .04.

SND was associated with high echocardiographic probability of PH in non-IPF ILDs (OR: 4.022, 95% CI 1.964–8.238, p<0.0001), whereas the association was only marginally significant in IPF (OR 3.130, 95% CI 0.966–10.149, p=0.06).

Despite this assay-effect, preferences were highly correlated between assays (r = 0.94), though with only four lines tested, this correlation is only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

In addition, the LCP and CL classes tended to score higher on withdrawn/depressed symptoms than the Low class, given that the overall Wald’s test was only marginally significant at p = .06.

Average respiration rates per larva were 9.33 x 10 −4 ± 2.53 x 10 −4 nmol O 2 min -1 (mean ± SD) across treatments after 24 h of exposure and declined to 6.01 x 10 −4 ± 1.97 x 10 −4 nmol O 2 min -1 after a week of recovery, but this was only marginally significant (p<0.06, df = 1, F = 15.83, S4 Table ).

The only significant individual predictors of spirituality were sex and having had a family member or co‐worker diagnosed with COVID‐19, but these accounted for less than 2% of the variance in spirituality (adjusted r ‐squared = .015), and the overall regression model was only marginally significant, F (7, 446) = 1.96, p = .06.

We determined that Keratin 39 overall was only marginally significant (P = 0.06; 0.8 power n = 15; 0.9 power n = 20) ( Fig 2 ).

However, the association between symptoms of STIs and HSV-2 status was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).

Although the relationship between the Monkey game and Word Recall Backward seemed to be stronger than the relationship between the Odd-One-Out and Word Recall Backward tasks, this difference was only marginally significant ( Z H = 1.91, p = .06).

The right amygdala showed a similar pattern, although the result was only marginally significant, F (2, 68) = 2.94, MSE = 0.15, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.08.

Although the Group × Training interaction was only marginally significant [ F (2, 24) = 3.17, MSE = 0.002, p = 0.06], t -test analysis demonstrated that both motor groups (QMT and SMT) significantly improved in speed [ t (8) = 3.26 and 2.99, p <0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.59 and 1.25, respectively], see Figure 3B . 3.2.

However, the interaction between instruction and stimulation was only marginally significant, F (1,19) = 3.99, p = .06, MSE = 1.24, η p 2 = .17.

The difference in the prevalence of hyposmia in the two groups compared was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06) as assessed through the Fisher’s test.

A post-hoc correlation of the difference in dyad scores with variant as a collapsed binary variable (non-fluent PPA vs other PPA) revealed a moderate but only marginally significant relationship (Rho = −.452, P = .06).