“only marginally significant”

Optimal Sleepers in month 1 also reported fewer sleepy days than Restless Sleepers ( p = 0.070), while Short Sleepers in month 6 reported more sleepy days than Nappers, although these findings were only marginally significant ( p = 0.060).

Additionally, this effect was only marginally significant between new donors and loyal donors ( β λ 1 = −0.28, p = 0.06) but was not significant between loyal donors and regular donors ( β λ 4 = −0.25, p = 0.16).

Although only marginally significant (One-way ANOVA, p -value = 0.06), moderately and severely symptomatic COVID-19 patients revealed larger WHG (K12) ancestry fractions compared to the asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic individuals, and the difference between mildly and moderately symptomatic individuals was statistically significant (Tukey’s multiple comparison, adjusted p -value = 0.04) ( Figure 6 A).

It should also be noted that although the interaction of worries with HWS-PE was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the same trend was observed (i.e., that the effect of COVID-19 worries on anxiety was stronger among individuals with low HWS-PE).

However, further pair-wise t-tests for the congruency effect per electrode site indicated that the congruency effect was only marginally significant at electrode sites PO6 (t(17) = 2.01, p = 0.06) and PO8 (t(17) = 1.78, p = 0.09).

On the other hand, the interaction was only marginally significant when limited to the two-flanker and four-flanker conditions, F (1, 8) = 5.04, p = 0.06, and was in the opposite direction.

Fungicide treatment reduced plant Hill-Shannon diversity ( F 3,60 = 5.42, p = 0.002, η 2 partial = 0.12) and Hill-Simpson diversity, although this latter main effect was only marginally significant ( F 3,60 = 2.68, p = 0.06, η 2 partial = 0.07).

Although a significant model fit to the data emerged, the predictive power of conscious motor processing was only marginally significant (after 1 month, p = 0.06; after 2 months, p = 0.08).

The correlation between stomatal density and vein density was only marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.01, p = 0.06).

SpA patients was slightly higher than in the general population, the difference being only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The unilateral approach appears to decrease the likelihood of new fractures; however, this decrease is only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Follow-up paired t -tests indicated that the beneficial effect of W1 concreteness was significant in the conceptual combination condition [ t (23) = 6.35, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.28], but only marginally significant in the frequency-comparison condition [ t (23) = 2.00, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.41].

However, here the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

hexagonus (800/1131, 70.7%) but the difference between the two tick species was only marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.6355, df = 1, P = 0.06).

Patients who developed VAP were younger (although only marginally significant, p -value = 0.06) and more frequently diagnosed with sepsis ( p -value = 0.02).

Consumption of all seafood combined (crabs, crawfish, shrimp, oysters, and fish) showed an increasing risk with increasing consumption, but the test for trend was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Although the variation in practice across grades was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), Grade 9 learners reported the highest level of hygiene practice (M = 0.54), indicating a possible trend.

The fully adjusted effect size of the CTQ total score was slightly larger but remained only marginally significant (β = 0.25 [95% CI: −0.01 to 0.49], t = 1.64, p = 0.06).

Nevertheless, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

However, the single injection, low-dose ferumoxytol plus AMF combination was only marginally significant at reducing tumor size (p = 0.06 for +/+ vs. −/−) (Fig. 4b ).

77.7%, p = 0.02), whereas perceived severity was only marginally significant (91.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.06).

For the easy level (Range 1), the model was not significant F (5,45) = 1.13, p > 0.05, and the only marginally significant predictor was performance IQ of the WASI ( β = −0.25, p = 0.06).

Stable high depressive symptoms were associated with increased stroke hazard compared with stable low/no depressive symptoms across age, race or ethnicity, and sex categories, although the association was only marginally significant among older participants ( P =0.06) (Table 5 ).

This trend was weak and only marginally significant ( p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.14).

The difference between future preparation and exploration ( M = 4.07, SD = 0.73) was only marginally significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (mean difference = 0.17, p = .06 [Bonferroni corrected], 95% CI [0.03, 0.31]).