“only marginally significant”

3 ), although the difference in 2010 was only marginally significant (χ 2 = 5.76, df = 2, p = 0.056).

Medication delivery showed a similar tendency, though only marginally significant (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.11–1.0, p = 0.056).

Although the odds ratio (OR) for the pooled RSA sample and the controls was only marginally significant (p = 0.056), OR for the RSA women with 2–3 abortions and the controls was significant (p = 0.03), suggesting a protective role for the allele ( Table 2 ).

The main effect of reason for group membership was only marginally significant, F (2, 281) = 2.91, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.01.

For RAN, the regression equation was only marginally significant [ F (2,28) = 3.219, p = 0.056].

Alone condition individuals showed no evidence of an increase in task engagement VC, t < 1; data regarding HR reactivity scores was only marginally significant, t (47) = 1.95, p = 0.056, d = 0.57 ( M = 4.94, SD = 17.54).

These results remain statistically significant using FDR-correction for multiple comparisons, except at 24 months where it is only marginally significant ( p = .056).

Interestingly, sugary food consumption (including table sugar, chocolate snacks, marmalade, honey, etc.) was lower in those individuals with FA, but in this case, the differences were only marginally significant ( p = 0.056). 3.3.

non-frailty difference was only marginally significant ( t (412) = 2.36, p = 0.056, Cohen’s d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.04, 0.50]).

Up-regulation of CA10 expressions were found in 7 of the 12 tumors with sW182* mutation (58.3%), while only 4 of the 19 tumors with wild type HBS had CA10 up-regulation (21.0%), but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.056) ( Table 1 ).

Emergent surgery seemed to be a protective factor against in‐hospital death in patients with CR, but was only marginally significant ( P =0.056) ( Table 3 ).

However, data are less compelling for APL patients carrying the FLT3 -D835 mutation: RR values included values smaller than 1, and the p -value was only marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

Likewise, in adults 30 to 59 years of age only, increasing change in SUVR in the posterior cortical ROI was again significantly associated with changing episodic memory ( F = 8.351, p = 0.006), while global SUVR change was only marginally significant ( F = 3.895, p = 0.056).

Additionally, higher levels of agreeableness were uniquely associated with stronger revenge motivations toward the self, even though this agreeableness/revenge relationship was only marginally significant at the level of bivariate correlations ( r = 0.22, p = 0.056, Table 5 ).

The probability of recruitment was negatively related to the abundance of Lobophora within a 50‐cm radius of a tile, although this result was only marginally significant (logistic regression, p = 0.056; Figure 2b ).

A dependence on light pulse intensity was also observed in cry1 , although the effect was only marginally significant (F 3,21 = 2.96, p = 0.056).

This correlation was also positive but only marginally significant during picture-negative condition, r = 0.13, p = 0.056, 95% CI = [−0.0055, 0.38]).

Regarding the direct effect of engagement on arousal, it is only marginally significant ( β = −0.16, 95% CI [−1.11, 0.01], p = 0.056).

However, in both rats and humans, sleep led to better memory performance compared with sleep deprivation (of note, in humans, the effect was only marginally significant with P = 0.056).

On the sporulation capacity the G × G interaction was only marginally significant (Table 2 analysis 3—Fungi × variety p = 0.056).

Interannual fluctuations in the abundance of sexual species were also higher in the Schorfheide (129.3 ± 101.3%) than in the Hainich (65.2 ± 54.0%) and Swabian Alb (70.9 ± 61.1%); however, this difference was only marginally significant ( F 2,36 = 3.11, p = .056). 4 Discussion 4.1 Temporal and regional differences Collembola abundance, biomass, and community composition differed markedly between years.

After controlling for age the odds of having tender/bleeding gums was higher in the CCP-positive group although this was only marginally significant ( p = 0.056) reflecting the small cohort for this analysis.

Switch time was manipulated by the experimenters in Experiment 3 with similar results: Steering was least smooth (i.e., angular acceleration was greatest) in the late switch time conditions but the effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

The association with anti-α-MSH IgA was only marginally significant [estimate = −0.0207 (± 0.0107), t = −1.9222, p = 0.0563] and completely disappeared after two outlying samples elimination [estimate = −0.0126 (± 0.0124), t = −1.0157, p = 0.3110].

Also, the model assessing service use within health care settings was only marginally significant (p =. 057).