“only marginally significant”

The total effect of FFI on communicative competence was negative and only marginally significant (β = −0.25 to −0.44, p = 0.055, 95% CI [−0.44, −0.06]).

The control group also reached significance in the English-to-Chinese direction ( d = 0.64), but only marginally significant in the Chinese-to-English direction ( p = 0.055).

At the wettest site (Pretoriuskop) grass biomass below tree canopies increased with tree height but that relationship was only marginally significant (adjusted R 2 = 10.2%, p = 0.055; Figure 2d ).

S1a), even though the difference in LA between treatments within ANRi plants was statistically only marginally significant ( P = 0.055).

However, the interaction was only marginally significant, F (1, 66) = 3.80, p = 0.055.

Respondents reporting the highest level of discrimination and othering acts (experienced stigma) had 2.2 times the odds (95% CI 1.0–4.7) of avoiding or delaying general health services in the fully adjusted model, but the association was only marginally significant (p=0.055).

The transfer block effect was also significant, F (1, 36) = 38.8, MSE = 41,094.99, p < .001, η 2 .52, and there was an average increase in RTs of 47 ms when a new sequence was suddenly presented. Although this transfer cost was almost twice as large for participants in the control condition as it was for participants in the RNG condition (62 ms and 32 ms, respectively), the interaction between Transfer and Condition was only marginally significant, F (1, 36) = 3.9, MSE = 4,160.21, p = .055, η 2 .098.

In contrast, the deductible coefficient was weak and only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

Parents showed a significant decrease in days of opioid use over time ( β : −0.34, p < .05) and were more likely to report total past-month abstinence from all drugs ( β : −0.06), but the difference was only marginally significant for past-month opioid abstinence ( β : −1.45; p = 0.055) ( Schaeffer et al., 2021 ). 3.4.

Social problem-solving skills (b=-0.99, p = 0.035) were a significant mediator of intervention effects on depression (Path a*b), whereas the mediating effect of behavioral activation was only marginally significant (b=-0.60; p = 0.055).

Inactive and intermittent-foragers showed similar trends of prophylactic grooming, but differences were only marginally significant (Wilcoxon test: W = 687, p = 0.055 for inactive; W = 56, p = 0.085 for intermittent-foragers).

The median age of assemblage A cases (47.5 years [range, 1 to 94 years]) was higher than that of assemblage B cases (37 years [range, 1 to 79 years]), but the difference was only marginally significant (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.055) ( Fig. 2 ).

After controlling for the covariates (age, education, area, safety knowledge and behavioral risk score), acute pesticide poisoning was 70% more likely to occur among female than among male applicators (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.99-2.91), but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.055).

This may also explain the interaction observed between atmosphere and glucose, although it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.055) ( Figure 4 E), with the difference of DI between aerobic and anaerobic conditions being greatest at 5.55 mM glucose.

When we additionally controlled for demographics, the positive link for team narcissism became only marginally significant, B = 0.10, 95% CI [0.01, 0.19], β = .15, p = .055 (although note that the standardized effect size remained identical).

Although the main effect of atomoxetine on decision noise was only marginally significant, F (1,252) = 3.71, P = 0.055, there was a significant interaction of treatment with horizon, F (2, 252) = 4.73, P < .01, indicating that the increase in decision noise from baseline to longer horizons was smaller in the drug condition than in the placebo condition ( Fig 3b and 3c ; Table 1 ).

However, this effect was only marginally significant (GLM, Negative binomial distribution, P = 0.055).

While self-esteem was only marginally significant ( p = .055), stress remained significant ( p < .01) after adjustment for employment status.

Only two out of the 13 parcellations yielded significant ROI-pairs at the p<0.05 significance level (‘Power264’ and ‘Talairach’), while a third parcellation produced only marginally significant ROI-pairs (‘Shen100’, p = 0.055)—see Table 8 and Fig 5 .

The same was seen in SCA2, though only marginally significant, probably due to the low number of patients (Spearman rho=-0.67, CI:0.92,-0.04, p =0.055).

However, after adjusting for depressive symptoms at time 1, the effect of anxiety at time 1 on depressive symptoms later at time 2 was only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

Respondents’ perception of water quality was positively associated with the likelihood of boiling water (OR = 1.28), although this was only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

Indeed, when allelic richness was compared without CapIsr, the difference between populations disappeared (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ 2 = 4.745, df = 9, P = 0.856), and the difference between habitat types became only marginally significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ 2 = 5.804, df = 2, P = 0.055).

32%) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

However, the observed correlation was weak and only marginally significant (p = 0.055; R 2 = 0.18) ( Fig 4 ).