“only marginally significant”

When the variances of these distributions were compared by using an F-test , the analysis showed that the difference between beta-based and HFO-based border prediction was only marginally significant [ F (1, 2) = 2.42, p = 0.054] while there was no statistically significant difference between the variance of individual sub-band powers (beta and HFO) and fused power [ F (1, 3) = 2.26, p = 0.075; F (2, 3) = 0.94, p = 0.88, respectively].

3 ; Table 2 ): Females used waters ~ 3185 m deep, with SICs of 9%, whereas males used waters ~ 340 m shallower, at mean depths of 2843 m and SICs 22% greater, at mean concentrations of 33%, although the latter difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

Inspection and palpation in cardiac examination were more error-prone in male than female students, although the differences were only marginally significant (both p = 0.054), and percussion in cardiac examination was more error-prone in female students ( p = 0.008, Table 4 ).

Multivariate analysis showed that NTR was a significant influencing factor for OS (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.06–8.48, P = 0.038) and LPFS (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.27–7.50, P = 0.013), while only marginally significant for DMFS (HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.99–3.42, P = 0.054) Table 2 .

Analysis of physical examination findings by age revealed that conjunctivitis was more common in older age groups ( p = 0.012), while shiner findings were more prevalent in younger age groups ( p = 0.002). The relationship between asthma presence and rhinitis findings showed that the frequency of asthma increased with age, though this association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

Laterality Hypothesis 2a—No difference in hand use frequency Across all experimental phases right-handed sFST (n = 164) were performed more often than left- handed sFST (n = 130) but the difference was only marginally significant (Binomial Test: p = .054; Table 3 ).

In Sample 2, this relationship was only marginally significant (β = −0.117, p = 0.054) after taking into account the effects of age, gender, and previous mental health help-seeking. 4 Discussion This study is the first to examine the psychosocial and mental health correlations of perceived teacher support after taking into account the effects of childhood trauma in a cross-cultural context.

However, divorced women were only found within the depressed women group (two cases), thus, marital status may be correlated to PPD but was only marginally significant ( p value = 0.054).

The movement type × tempo interaction was only marginally significant, F (8, 160) = 2.32, p = 0.054, and η p 2 = 0.10 ( Figure 3(a) ).

However, subsequent analysis of the final model indicated that while age of diagnosis (HR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05) was significant (p<0.05), cluster ID (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.00) was only marginally significant (p=0.054).

However, survival in cancer stage IA–IIIA patients was statistically different using the CKD‐CG formula ( P < 0.001) and only marginally significant using the CKD‐EPI formula ( P = 0.054).

1 B), we found that participants in the training group showed greater improvements than participants in the control group, although this group difference was only marginally significant for the DMC trials ( p = 0.054).

For those over 18 years, being male was only marginally significant ( P =.054).

1 b), although this effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

The blind model showed a 2-way interaction involving WordType and Area (F 2,24 = 19.07, ε = 0.43, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.63), but the 4-way interaction of the factors WordType, PeriExtra, TemporalFrontal and Area was only marginally significant (F 2,22 = 3.47, ε = 0.95, p = 0.054).

However, this association was only marginally significant at the 5% level ( b = -1.28, 95% CI: -2.59, 0.02, p = .054).

64 [IQR: 47–86] ng/L), but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = .054).

W- and WHo-exposed scallops showed a small but significant accumulation in ubiquitin conjugates at 26°C compared with 18°C and 22°C (W group, P <0.018) or with 14°C (Who group, P =0.010), whereas the accumulation in WHc-exposed scallops was only marginally significant (14°C versus 26°C, P =0.054).

Transition Rates—Visible Patterning For human-visible patterning, a model with one hidden rate was supported over a model without hidden rates ( Table 1 ), though the likelihood-ratio test was only marginally significant (P = 0.054).

Analogous results, albeit only marginally significant, were obtained in the duration threshold of large stimulus (diameter of 10°) ( T = 1.96, P = 0.054) ( Figure 5 A ).

In contrast, though only marginally significant, AFR PLWH with HP2 had lower risk ( OR = 0.111, p = 0.054) of developing NCI compared to people without HP2 ( Figure 2A ).

The task notation × number range interaction was only marginally significant F (1,26) = 4.057, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.135.

However, there were only marginally significant improvements in positive symptoms (SMD = 0.340, 95% CI = −0.006 to 0.686, p = 0.054) and negative symptoms (SMD = 0.399, 95% CI = −0.059 to 0.857, p = 0.088) in studies conducted in European countries.

However, this correlation was only marginally significant ( p = .054), meaning it was almost statistically significant but did not quite reach the level of significance at (0.05).

Familiar partner recognition by males There were significant differences in TF rates of males among trials (repeated measures GLM, F 3,27 = 3.95, P = 0.018) and between treatments ( F 1,9 = 28.69, P < 0.0005) but the interaction between trial and treatment was only marginally significant ( F 3,27 = 2.89, P = 0.054).