“only marginally significant”

Model 4 indicates that higher area-level tobacco spending contributes additional independent risk for aggressive grade, although the effect is relatively modest, with an increase of 1% in the odds of aggressive tumor histology associated with a $100 increase in average annual household spending on tobacco, and only marginally significant (p = 0.05).

The only marginally significant difference is observed for ER between GN and GL, with a P-value P = 0.05.

We did not observe a significant genetic correlation between male BSB and childlessness but observed a significant positive genetic association between female BSB and childlessness that would become only marginally significant (adjusted P = 0.05) upon the control of multiple testing (table S3).

In our study, other HCP characteristics were not significant, while professional role was only marginally significant ( p = 0.050), possibly due to limited statistical power. 4.3.

The GLM analysis with three different response models (by varying the HRF peak latency with 3s increments) yielded almost entirely distinctive activation maps ( Fig 2B ), each of which was only marginally significant ( p <0.05, uncorrected).

Species was a highly significant predictor of ASV alpha diversity in the bees (χ 2 9 = 125.34, P < 0.001), while diet was only marginally significant after controlling for species (χ 2 2 = 5.98, P = 0.050).

However, the differences between ligand-modified and unmodified DNA-complexes were only marginally significant (0.03 < p < 0.05).

In contrast, problem-solving showed only marginally significant and negligible sex differences favoring women (−0.05 SDs, 95% CI = [−0.09, 0.00], p = .05).

In general, the Tukey-test (Table S1a–f) showed a significant effect of interspecific competition ( p < 0.001) in all cases except for the bur weight in 2023, whereas for the intraspecific competition it was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the plant biomass in both years and for bur number in 2022, significant ( p < 0.01) for the bur number and only marginally significant ( p < 0.05) for the bur weight in 2022 (Fig. 3 ).

In general, the clinical sample had larger means than the controls for depression (t = −4.05, p = 0.00, d = 0.91), anxiety (t = −6.34, p = 0.00, d = 1.45), NATs (t = −2.64, p = 0.01, d = 0.61), IBs (t = −2.91, p = 0.00, d = 0.67), fatigue (t = −2.44, p = 0.02, d = 0.55), and health status (t = −6.38, p = 0.00, d = 1.42), with the exception of DAs, which was only marginally significant (t = −1.96, p = 0.05, d = 0.45).

Figure 2 C illustrates that this was indeed the case: for IDDs the correlation between DST scores in the two languages was highly significant (Pearson: r = .60, p < .001, Spearman r = .61, p < .001), whereas for controls it was not (Pearson: r = .25, p = .179, Spearman r = .27, p = .151; though the group difference between the strength of the correlations was only marginally significant: Fishers Z-test, z = 1.64, one-sided p < .05; Fig. 2 C; Lenhard & Lenhard, 2014 ).

Line B chickens graded as high or low using feed conversion, also differed moderately in the abundance of Firmicute s, although this difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.05).

The DASS-A emerged as the only marginally significant predictor of ratings for the ambiguous danger CS D, ρ(49) = −0.27, p = 0.05.

Although there were no statistically significant 2-way interactions ( p's > 0.26), follow-up pair-wise t-tests showed that post-training theta power in the eMBT group was decreased in the 3-back condition only compared to baseline ( t (15) = 3.89, p = 0.001), but only marginally significant compared to post-training theta power in the Control group ( t (27) = 2.06, p = 0.05).

The concentration of DBEP was found to be only marginally significant correlated with urinate habit (OR 4.042; 95% CI 1.002–16.295, p = 0.050) (Table 5 B).

Although only marginally significant, contemporary Ne was related to the Ne of the past (Ne at the time of introduction, NANC; r = 0.46, 0.1 > p > 0.05).

However, after adding the number of comorbidities, baseline medications, previous hospitalizations and informed consent by proxy (factors that differed significantly between groups at baseline), sex was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05) while a significant association between the number of baseline medications and both underuse and overuse was found: underuse decreased with an increasing number of medications (for each additional medication OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95), while overuse increased (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04–1.12).

However, in the post-hoc test, the significant difference between the powdery mildew treatment and healthy control shifted and was only marginally significant (estimate = – 3.0, t-ratio = 11.6 37.4, df = -2.836, p = 0.05).

The optically measured oxCCO increase, however, was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05), and the oxCCO data were not directly associated with the LPR changes.

Mowing had no significant effect on all bacterial indicators, with only marginally significant improvement in fungal Shannon ( p < 0.05).

Dry eyes (100% vs 89.2%), fibromyalgia (31.3% vs 13.5%), depression (38.5% vs 13.5%), and antidepressant use (43.8% vs 21.6%) were also more common in seronegative than in seropositive patients, but the statistical association was only marginally significant ( P < .05).

However, the effect of bacterial species loss via dilution is only marginally significant ( P = 0.05) when both soils are analyzed together and not any more when the soils are analyzed separately.

After adjusting for covariants, the AG genotype for rs40593 (OR=0.557, 95% CI=0.331-0.938; p =0.028), the CT genotype for rs3755751 (OR=0.579, 95% CI=0.347-0.966; p =0.036), and the G-allele carriers (AG plus GG) for rs40593 (OR=0.535, 95% CI=0.324-0.886; p =0.015) still exhibited a significant protective effect; however, the association between T-allele genotypes and rs3755751 was only marginally significant (OR=1.637, 95% CI=0.999-2.681; p =0.05).

Similarly, a significant difference between the groups was observed in the change (from 0 to 6 W) in the Physical Component Summary Universal (two components) ( p = 0.049; Figure 5 B), although the change in the Physical Component Summary (three components) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

Whilst the semantic class of the image was related to classification accuracy, the raw meaning (as measured by the average semantic differential scores) was only marginally significant (all p >0.05).