“on the threshold of significance”

For the multivariate analysis, variables that demonstrated statistical significance or were on the threshold of significance in the univariate analyses ( p < 0.2) were selected.

Although the confidence interval borders on the threshold of significance, the findings remain clinically meaningful and suggest that the score effectively captures biologically relevant features of tumor aggressiveness, such as mitotic activity and necrosis—see Figure 10 .

We applied the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure on the threshold of significance to correct for multiple comparison.

When comparing bleeding vs lesions on both sides, the difference was also on the threshold of significance.

This consideration led us to our first scenario in which a trial based on inference is on the threshold of significance, that is, able to achieve a p-value of 0.05 or better.

In contrast, two other studies in an Iranian [15] and Turkish [27] populations reported association of the IL6 -174 SNP with GD, albeit in the latter the association was on the threshold of significance.

The interaction of Arousal × Cue validity, F (1, 41) = 3.74, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0 .084 , was on the threshold of significance.

DEGs), where the number of the genes belong to a list depends on the threshold of significance.

Regarding the ease scores, Google Gemini's responses had a higher mean ease score (47.53) compared to ChatGPT (36.63), with a p-value of 0.0500, which is on the threshold of significance.

We also found that expression of Cyp302a1/dib and Cyp315a1/sad , two other ecdysone biosynthetic P450 genes, were also lower than in ouib 29 / ouib 74 animals compared to control animals, but their reduction was just on the threshold of significance ( Fig 4A ).

Second, we accepted the results of individual original studies as reported, since ALE analyses do not allow for weighting based on the threshold of significance employed in each original study.

Kim and colleagues [ 24 ] found that individualism was negatively associated with perceived vulnerability to Ebola risk, however they found a small effect and slightly on the threshold of significance level for I while the effect of C was larger.

Although the Welch’s t test for differences in social connection between the collaborative imagine and collaborative perception (scene) ( M = 5.47, SD = 0.61) conditions fell on the threshold of significance following Bonferroni correction ( t (81.93) = 2.48, P Bonf = 0.05, d = 0.54, 95% CI [0.11, 0.98]), the effect size for this condition difference would be considered medium following conventional guidelines ( 50 ) (please note, these analyses were also run using Student’s t tests and conventional ANOVAs rather than Welch’s models, which found comparable results to those presented here).

Results Self-report VAS measures There was a small but significant difference in the nausea scale between drug and placebo conditions for atomoxetine and a difference on the threshold of significance for citalopram, corresponding to a change of 3.9 (citalopram)/6.6 (atomoxetine) on a 100-point scale.

Validation of expression patterns Three ESTs deemed to be differentially expressed, using the LIMMA package of Bioconductor, plus one on the threshold of significance were chosen for validation of array predictions by real time PCR analyses.