All tests were two-tailed with the significance level set at p ≤.05 and the level of borderline significance set at p ≤.10.
← all phrases
“of borderline significance”
In the literature
Results of Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis with missing values replaced by imputed scores from multiple regression, produced very little change, with just two results changing from being of borderline significance (p<0.1) to being significant (p<0.05) ( Tables 6 and 7 ).
of borderline significancep < .10
Overall, 12 of the 15 potential predictors of psychiatric diagnosis were statistically significant in the univariate analysis ( p < .05), and one additional predictor was of borderline significance ( p < .10).
of borderline significancep < 0.1
However, effect modification by genotype on associations of patella and tibia lead with uric acid of borderline significance ( p < 0.1) was observed; β-coefficients (and slopes) were greater in those with the variant allele.
of borderline significancep = 0.10
More recently the HPTN-035 trial of 0.5% PRO2000 gel (Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, PA, USA), a viral entry inhibitor, reported an estimated effectiveness of 30% (95% CI [-8%; 54%]) which, although of borderline significance (p = 0.10), was welcomed with optimism [ 3 ].
of borderline significancep =0.10
Ccr was of borderline significance and was not eliminated by backward stepwise calculation if p =0.10.
of borderline significancep < 0.10
In addition, in each of these three domains, a number of indicators (responses on reasons for Tetanus Toxoid vaccination, correct reporting on recommended lying position during pregnancy, responses on birth preparedness components, correct reporting on recommended number (four) of postpartum care visits, receiving care from facilities for complications during pregnancy, responses about the place of vaccination, responses on type of care to be given for diarrhea) were also of borderline significance ( p < 0.10).
The differences in the reductions of total cholesterol and LDL-C were of borderline significance (p=0.10 and p=0.055, respectively) ( Fig. 1 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.10
Positive associations of borderline significance were observed for nitrogen dioxide [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.21 per 10 μg/m 3 ; p = 0.10] and nitrogen oxides (adjusted OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.08 per 20 μg/m 3 ; p = 0.08).
of borderline significancep = 0.10
In England, higher area-level THM exposure during the third trimester was associated with higher adduct levels (see Supplemental Material, Table S4), but the association was of borderline significance ( p = 0.10).
of borderline significanceP > 0.1
Recessive models of SNP effects were tested, but, apart from FTO , which was significant for both recessive and dominant modes of action, none of the analysed polymorphisms showed differences even of borderline significance ( P > 0.1 in all cases).
of borderline significancep < .10
As regards changes in performance from baseline to longitudinal follow-up measurements, the associations remained significant for both semantic and episodic memory, except for 5-year changes in episodic memory that were only of borderline significance ( p < .10) after control for covariates.
of borderline significancep > 0.1
Part-time workers may have been less likely to report depression and anxiety than full-time workers (aOR 0.51 (95%CI 0.22–1.11) and 0.36 (95%CI 0.13–0.84), respectively), but this was only of borderline significance (p > 0.1 for depression, p = 0.026 for anxiety) and may be an artefact of multiple comparisons.
of borderline significancep = 0.10
While there was a clear correlation between tumor size and the mean number of positive lymph nodes in both the non-TNP and the TNP group, this correlation was less strong with the TNP group (P = 0.01) and the interaction between tumor size and TNP status on lymph node status was of borderline significance (p = 0.10, Figure 1 ).
of borderline significanceP < 0.1
Univariate analysis was conducted on factors relevant to presentation or initial treatment and, subsequently, multivariate analysis was conducted on factors that were significant or of borderline significance ( P < 0.1) on univariate analysis.
Heterogeneity was of borderline significance (I 2 =51%, p=0.10), and the pooled OR was 2.04 (1.33, 3.14) p=0.001, Figure 3(b) .
of borderline significanceP ≤ 0.10
All analyses were two tailed, with the level of significance set at P ≤ 0.05 and the level of borderline significance set at P ≤ 0.10.
of borderline significanceP < 0.10
Results were deemed statistically significant at P < 0.05 and of borderline significance at 0.05 < P < 0.10.
Although more male offspring were delivered from OB mothers, adjustment for sex showed that the effect between sex and groups was of borderline significance (p=0.1) suggesting that the lack of a statistically significant difference in NB%fat between groups was also likely due to the limited sample size.
of borderline significanceP ≤ 0.10
To identify independent factors associated with MR severity in patients with AF, stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed; variables found to be significant or of borderline significance by univariate analysis ( P ≤ 0.10), including duration of AF, LA volume, E/E’, AA, AC, annulus CW, AHCWR, AL surface area,PL surface area and leaflet tenting volume, were included in the equation.
of borderline significanceP = 0,104
GCNT2 and ST6GALNac1 were seemingly higher expressed in the same group, however, at a level of borderline significance ( P = 0,104 for GCNT2 and P = 0,094 for ST6GALNac1).
of borderline significancep=.1059
Women who had received chemotherapy were more likely to have a history of congestive heart failure (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.57-361.67); the association was of borderline significance (p=.1059).
of borderline significanceP = 0.108
The log-rank test confirmed that there were significant differences between groups in terms of OS (log-rank P = 0.019), while for PFS the result was of borderline significance (log rank P = 0.108).
of borderline significanceP = 0.11
The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on event-free survival was smaller and of borderline significance ( P = 0.11).
of borderline significancep = 0.11
Subsequent perfusion of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist (1 μM scopolamine) in the continued presence of carbachol partially reversed the suppressive effect of carbachol, although its effect was of borderline significance ( n = 5, p = 0.11 and 0.02 for 4 aEPSGs at 400 and 800 ms, respectively, paired t -tests).