When assessed as means, pregnancies in the adolescent group lasted shorter than pregnancies in the non-adolescent group, an observation of borderline significance (38.13 ± 3.19 versus 38.46 ± 2.72 weeks respectively, p = 0.050).
For studies with a reported mean tumor diameter <2 cm and ≥2 cm, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 and 0.77 with an AUC of 0.77, and 0.78 and 0.73 with an AUC of 0.82, respectively; no significant between-group difference was observed in sensitivity ( p = 0.22), whereas the difference in AUC was of borderline significance ( p < 0.05).
Conversely, in the same two datasets, analysis of nccRCC cases revealed a correlation of borderline significance ( P = .05) between high transcript-level expression of the IL-8 gene evaluated in surgical tissue and worse DFS in the Firehose Legacy dataset ( Figure S8 , see online supplementary material for a color version of this figure).
However, a double-blind randomized controlled trial by the same group enrolling 52 patients could not confirm the effect of mannitol administration on SBP decline during dialysis sessions and the decrease in IDH risk was of borderline significance (P = 0.05) [ 110 ].
Three out of our 18 studies have independently concluded that rhythmic auditory stimulation can improve gait disturbance ( 22 , 31 , 36 ), however, in combining the original data (a total of 106 patients), the results were of borderline significance ( p = 0.05).
There was a trend of borderline significance ( p = 0.05) for such students to be ranked higher in OSCEs (average of 7.5% or 25 out of 335, p = 0.049).
On analysis of nicotine infusions, although no main effect of treatment was recorded, a treatment by day interaction of borderline significance was noted (F16,152 = 1.7, P = 0.05) reflecting a treatment effect on infusions related to the test day.
In six reviews, the effect size favoured combination therapy with PRP compared to controls (from very-low to low certainty of evidence); in one review 29 a trend toward benefit of PRP+ microneedling over microneedling alone was observed, but the difference was of borderline significance (p=0.05; low-level of certainty).
Among women with pre-cancerous lesions, HIV positive women tended to be younger, but the age differences were not statistically significant for ASCUS or HSIL and only of borderline significance for LSIL (p = 0.05).
No other factors were significant but belief that addiction was a ‘disease’ was of borderline significance in predicting lower support for imprisonment (OR = 0.68, 0.46-1.00, p = 0.05).
A weak positive association was observed between residence in a county with less use of public transportation and having had a Pap test in the past 3 years, which was of borderline significance (adjusted OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4, p = .05).
Compared with patients with no NSSs who provided GISs (13 of 24), patients with 4 or more NSSs who provided GISs (22 of 26) reported worse global functioning of borderline significance (mean [SD] GIS, 56.0 [22.6] vs 40.6 [26.7]; P = .05).
2.84 ± 1.25 mL/g/min, P = 0.01) in diabetics compared with non-diabetics. MPR was decreased in diabetics compared with prediabetics of borderline significance (2.10 ± 0.76 vs. 2.88 ± 1.34 mL/g/min, P = 0.05).
However, this was only of borderline significance (z = 1.9, P = 0.05).
However, it should be emphasized that the p value for the GDM-G1 and GDM-G2 subgroups was of borderline significance ( p = 0.05).
Additionally performed Kruskal-Wallis tests further confirmed the non-significant associations of ADAM9 expression with M-status (p = 0.096), nodal status (p = 0.098), whereas residual tumour status was of borderline significance (p = 0.050).
The reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with liraglutide was of borderline significance versus placebo ( P =0.05).
The odds of depression were also higher among those with no education (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.46–4.60) compared to participants with higher education while it was of borderline significance (OR: 1.60; 95% Cl: 1.00–2.56; p = 0.05) among those with school education.
Differences between HT and CHD-patients were of borderline significance (CHD-vs.-HT: F (1,137)=3.91, p =.050,η 2 p =.03, f =0.18; with covariates: p= .08).
Diastolic BP was also reduced from baseline to week 52, but the difference between empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg (−2.2 mm Hg) and empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg (−2.2 mm Hg) compared with linagliptin monotherapy (−0.6 mm Hg) was only of borderline significance ( P = .05) and was similar to empagliflozin monotherapy (−1.9 mm Hg [25 mg] and 1.8 mm Hg [10 mg]).
The difference between centroid errors for PPCA and preoperative MPCA was of borderline significance (p = 0.05).
The simple slope for learning environment at 1 SD above the mean was significantly positive (B = 0.17, p < 0.001), but was only of borderline significance for a learning environment 1 SD below the mean (B = 0.09, p = 0.05).
Furthermore, diastolic blood pressure, an important factor for myocardial perfusion, was of borderline significance with 12 ± 2 mmHg with machine-delivered CC compared to 8 ± 4 mmHg with human-delivered CC ( p = 0.05) (Table 1 ).
In contrast, T H 1 levels differed between males and females when comparing the elderly controls above 50 years of age but not when comparing the whole control group; a similar difference of borderline significance (Figure 5B ; p = 0.05) was observed only for patients with untreated disease.
Moreover, RCCs of the clear cell type, which were reported to exhibit a poorer prognosis than papillary RCCs ( Cheville et al , 2003 ) showed higher XIAP expression levels when compared with XIAP levels in papillary RCCs ( Figure 3D ), although the difference was of borderline significance only ( P =0.05).