“not strictly significant”

In fact, there is a trend of improvement, though not strictly significant, in long-term retention of content knowledge in students taught with this approach.

Mean hippocampal volume was decreased at a nominally significant level ( d =−0.214; P =0.016), but was not strictly significant after correction for multiple comparisons ( Supplementary Table 15 ).

Essentially the same effect was found in both the multivariable analysis (10-year follow-up) and univariable analysis (25-year follow-up), but these findings were not strictly significant.

Others proposed the association of solely ABCB1 rs1128503 (OR = 2.02, p = 0.401) with global toxicity, or of ABCB1 rs1045642 with early toxicity (OR = 3.79, p = 0.098) (not strictly significant), while others did not find any association at all [ 74 , 93 , 95 , 96 ].

An extended analysis on these two SNPs provided some promising but not strictly significant results, and we reported them in the Supplementary Material for the interest of readers.

Because the interaction terms were not strictly significant and number of cases with a family history of PCa was very small, these results should be interpreted with caution.

All conditions that are not strictly significant are within 0.04 of the absolute critical value of R (0.57 for L 1.5 and S in ST, 0.56 for T in ST, 0.55 for CCW in ST, −0.56 for L 1.5 in HO, −0.54 for I 1.5 in HO).

A direct comparison of the CD8 + T-cell response against E1 from Ii-E1E2E6E7 and E1E2E6E7 (Mann-Whitney rank-sum) revealed a p-value of 0.06, which is not strictly significant, but strongly indicates a tendency of Ii improving the magnitude of CD8 + T-cells against E1.

After re-stimulation with the mixed peptides, although some activation could be observed in several PBMC samples, they were not strictly significant according to the assay of IFN-γ intracellular staining (data not shown).

Although not strictly significant, an increase in abundance of the fungivorous sap beetle G. quadripunctatus from 0 to 20 individuals in early succession increased probability of G. applanatum presence in late succession with as much as 43% in closed and 25% in open habitat (Fig. 2 ), as predicted from the model (Table 1 ).

However, this result, while not strictly significant, shows a trend toward statistical significance, which may be clinically meaningful and warrants further consideration.

Tensile strength was lower ( p = .035), while pentosidine was higher ( p = .006) in donors with CKD than donors without kidney disease, but the difference in strength ( p = .055) and pentosidine ( p = .151) were not strictly significant when adjusting for covariates.

Because of the strong association with the use of rituximab with longer survival (we found evidence for a 30% reduction in risk in those treated, although not strictly significant at 0.05 level), even after adjusting for calendar year, the difference in risk associated with HIV status was strongly attenuated after controlling for use of rituximab alone.

The difference in the RESCUE-ESE density between IN-PS and CR-E/DN-E or CR-I/DN-I was not strictly significant, which was partly attributable to a low number of these signals in Y-rich sequences upstream of 3′ss.

While not strictly significant, there are variables that show moderate effect sizes and should not be dismissed, especially in exploratory or applied research contexts.

Although not strictly significant due to the small sample size, this trend aligns with our METAFlux analysis.

Although not strictly significant, our linkage peaks are located in chromosomal regions containing relevant candidate genes involved in the control of immunity.