Barely Significant
← all phrases

“not quite statistically significant”

342 sentences · 342 papers · 443 search hits before verification

In the literature

not quite statistically significantp = 1.80 × 10 −40.0× alpha
Additionally, though not quite statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing, HLA‐DPB1*06:01 was associated with a lower middle frontal LB count (Multiplicative effect = 0.40, p = 1.80 × 10 −4 , Supplementary Fig. 1 ), HLA‐DRB1*11:01 was linked to a lower Thal amyloid phase (≥3: 44.7% vs 74.8%, OR 0.34, p = 1.56 × 10 −4 ), HLA‐DPB1*06:01 was associated with a lower inferior parietal LB count (multiplicative effect = 0.41, p = 6.33 × 10 −4 , Supplementary Fig. 1 ), and HLA‐B*15:01 was linked to an increased risk of diffuse LBD (85.7% vs 67.2%, OR 3.43, p = 7.58 × 10 −4 ).
In the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm, PFS was numerically higher in the PD-L1≥1% group (median 15.1 months vs NR, p=0.0518) though not quite statistically significant, and the OS also favored the PD-L1≥1% group (median 26.1 months vs NR, p=0.0042).
Multivariate analysis showed patients’ age, positive endocervical and overall excision margins and worse definitive histological diagnosis (high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinoma) to be statistically significant (p < 0.001) in predicting higher recurrence/persistence rate, whereas positive ectocervical excision margin was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.0447) and cone depth was not statistically significant at all (p = 0.181).
Oral Free Paper Sessions.
Virchows Arch · 2016 · PMC7103182