The overall main effect of group was not quite significant ( p = .062).
← all phrases
“not quite significant”
Sighted at
p=.11p=0.118
In the literature
Abnormal cells showed reduced ( p = 0.011) collagen thickness with average process length for L 5 , but the decrease for L 10 cells was not quite significant ( p = 0.062; Fig. 5d ).
Cholesterol/ApoA‐I ratio positively and significantly correlated with ventricular volume ( p = 0.043), while negatively correlated with grey matter volume, albeit this was not quite significant ( p = 0.063).
Spectral analysis of blood pressure data revealed a statistically significant decrease (−3.98 mmHg 2 , p = 0.041) in total SBP variability between day zero (d0) (7.08 ± 1.75 mmHg 2 ) and day 14 (d14) (4.2 ± 0.96 mmHg 2 ), with a similar, but not quite significant, trend in VLF SBP (−1.90 mmHg 2 , p = 0.063) across these time-points (d0: 4.36 ± 0.65, d14: 2.46 ± 0.65 mmHg 2 ) ( Supplementary Figure 8 ).
In V1, cross-sensory activations occurred 10 ms later than sensory-specific activations, but this difference was not quite significant ( p = 0.063).
The change in slope of the evenness-disease relationship from 1998 to 2002 was not quite significant ( F 1,125 = 3.52, P = 0.063).
In a test of divided attention, for example, this improvement was not quite significant ( p = 0.063) after 5 months but, after another 5 months of extra training, the level of improvement further increased, reaching more reliable effects ( p = 0.002).
Translocally adaptive cells also showed a number of data points along the lower-left diagonal, but this was not quite significant in our data ( P = 0.064, sign test).
Mortality tended to increase more with caffeine concentration in uninfected mosquitoes than in infected mosquitoes, although this interaction was not quite significant ( χ 2 = 8.87, df = 4, p = 0.064).
When comparing health status groups together, we observed a slight but not quite significant (p < 0.0646) difference between cognitively healthy controls and ADs.
The increase in BDE-99 was not quite significant ( r = 0.19, p < 0.065; data not shown).
The first row of the middle section of Table 3 showed that the statistics for %SS were similar to those in the top section of Table 3 except that phase contrast 2 was not quite significant (p = 0.065) and there was an additional effect of age.
2 ) was not quite significant (P = 0.065).
With only female data, transplant height is not quite significant in 2011 (F 2,17.173 =3.213, P=0.065), probably due to smaller sample size in each region, as the posthoc relationships between regions remain the same as in the full dataset ( S2 and S3 Tables).
The three-way interaction between sex, diet, and strain, which indicates whether there is a genetic basis for sexual dimorphism in response to dietary fat, was not quite significant ( P = 0.065).
pestis strains: CXCL10 (significant at P = 0.0423) and IL-6 (not quite significant at P = 0.066), but the differences were less than 2-fold.
Additionally, in the latter treatment, there was more than a two-fold decrease in vitellogenin expression (t 4 = 6.763, p<0.0025), whereas this effect in promethazine was positive, although not quite significant (t 4 = 2.511, p>0.066).
There was also a significant increase in whining from baseline to test in the placebo group when analyzed combined ( p = 0.013) but the increase for the separation test was not quite significant ( p = 0.067; Figure 7 ).
Finally, the RV/(LV + S) ratio seemed lower in mice exposed to hypoxia and iNO than in controls or mice with perinatal hypoxia, but the difference was not quite significant between mice born in hypoxia in the presence or absence of iNO ( P = 0.0677, using the Mann-Whitney test), as well as between mice born in hypoxia plus iNO and controls ( P = 0.0967, using the Mann-Whitney test).
This trend in ORs was highly significant among men ( p < .001) but not quite significant for women ( p < .068).
In the 1 hour group, TrkB expression was reduced but it was not quite significant (P= 0.068) in the 3 hours group in which TrkB was reduced significantly (P= 0.004).
The values for T8Dist/L1 nerve pairs (c) look like they might fit within a similar relationship, but, even when they were all are considered as one population, they gave a value for r 2 of only 0.358, not quite significant ( P = 0.068).
Yet, surviving nests grew larger the further away they were from the swamp, but this effect was also small and not quite significant in a stepwise regression model ( r 2 = 0.20, F = 3.82, P = 0.069; distance to swamp: b = 0.01, t = 1.96, P = 0.069).
For S2, confidence was nearly significantly higher with both channels of feedback than with pressure only, though this difference was not quite significant (p = 0.069), while confidence with both types of feedback was statistically indistinguishable from proprioception only (p = 1).
The presence of LN metastasis (HR 2.805; 95% CI, 1.359–5.792; p = 0.005) was the only independent predictor of DFS, and pretreatment NLR-PLR group was not quite significant ( p = 0.069).