Barely Significant
← all phrases

“not quite significant”

649 sentences · 649 papers · 6,904 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=.11p=0.118

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

not quite significantP =0.102.0× alphagold
Mice from both treatment conditions that spent more time exploring the novel object across repeated test days tended to show shorter novel-object exploration latencies, but the correlation was not quite significant ( r =−0.34, df 22, P =0.10).
Stress inoculation modeled in mice.
Transl Psychiatry · 2015 · PMC4354359
not quite significantp = 0.102.0× alphagold
In fact, for trials preceded by a previous congruent stimulus, the correlation was moderately positive but still not quite significant, r = 0.25, ( r c = 0.40), t (46) = 1.73, p = 0.10; but for trials preceded by a previous incongruent stimulus, the correlation was numerically even negative, r = − 0.23, t (46) = 1.59, p = 0.13.
not quite significantP = 0.1032.1× alphagold
Sunflower-fed females made more ovipunctures ( F (1,110) = 5.47, P = 0.021) and laid more eggs ( F (1,110) = 4.57, P = 0.035) in sunflower plants than did soybean-fed females, but differences were not quite significant for either number of ovipunctures ( F (1,43) = 2.77, P = 0.103) or number of eggs laid ( F (1,43) = 3.46, P = 0.070) in soybean plants.
not quite significantp = .1112.2× alphagold
Changes in ACT use in Rukwa were modest and insignificant, while the change in Mtwara between Rounds 1 and 3 was substantial at 10.55 percentage points among individuals and 13.08 among households, though not quite significant at conventional levels (p = .111 for individuals, p = .083 for households).
not quite significantP = .122.4× alphagold
CD4 cells did not show any significant alterations in the meta-analysis, although CD4 Mem cells, characterized by the high expression of IL7R, PLP2, and Fos seemed to have an overall decrease in NDMM compared with the precursor stages, which was seen in both data sets ( P ≤ .05 in the UAMS and UoH data set), although not quite significant in the meta-analysis ( P = .12) ( Figure 2 A).