“not quite significant”

Leaf temperature was higher with (UV+) than without (UV-) UV radiation, but this difference was not quite significant (p = 0.08; Table S4 ; Figure 3a ).

The meta-analysis of CRP involved a much larger total sample than TwinsUK, and the present study finds only suggestive evidence of association, with CRP levels being higher in CWP cases, but the test of association is not quite significant ( p < 0.08).

The analysis confirmed a main effect of group, F (1, 22) = 24.00, p < .001, η p 2 = .52, and of block, F (1.5, 33.2) = 5.55, p = .014, η p 2 = .20, and an interaction that was not quite significant ( p = .08).

Reported attacks of malaria had no effect on BP-S; however, those reporting an attack of typhoid (often as “typhoid-malaria”) had lower median BP-S (117 versus 126) but this is not quite significant at the 0.05 level ( p = 0.08, one-way ANOVA, F = 3.04, and df = 332), and reports of other illnesses had no statistical significance.

18 ) but in a test for such interaction, adjusting for “without radon” covariates, and also adjusting for quartiles of cumulative DEMS_REC1 lagged 15 years, the interaction term was not quite significant ( p = 0.08) and, more importantly, tests for an effect of REC exposure appeared to be little impacted by whether or not smoking was entered as a main effect and in an interaction term or only as a main effect.

The main effect of nouns was not quite significant, F 1(1, 64) = 3.08, p = 0.08, F 2(1, 29) = 1.56, p = 0.22, although the pattern observed in Experiments 1A, 1B, and 2A appeared once again, with shorter reading times when there were more nouns.

Although here the proprioceptive shifts during error-clamp adaptation (Exp 2) were tiny, and not quite significant (p<0.08), the reports are relative to the actual location of the passively placed unseen hand, measured in trials separate from those with reach adaptation and therefore there is no visual target to anchor their estimates to.

In contrast, the association between qHBsAg level (log 10 U/mL) and ALT ( P < 0.001) was weaker, not quite significant with APRI ( P = 0.08), and in the opposite direction with FIB‐4 ( P = .01), with a higher HBsAg level associated with a lower odds of a higher FIB‐4 category (Supporting Fig.

Univariate linear regression analysis with P28 refractive error as the outcome variable and FDM (versus control) as the predictor variable, showed that if a P14 GP underwent 2 weeks of FDM, at P28 the refractive error was on average 1.85D more myopic than that in GPs undergoing physiological growth; this difference was not quite significant statistically ( P = 0.081, n = 70).

The main effect of genotype was not quite significant ( p = 0.0814); however, a trend of increased hemosiderin staining in APPPS1:E4 is visualized in Figure 3 E, as APPPS1:E3 mice exhibited little spontaneous microhemorrhage compared to APPPS1:E4 mice. 2.3.

The apparent association increased post-intervention for both contaminants, and the association became significant for Pb (X 2 of 9.75 and p = 0.002), but the association for A S was not quite significant (X 2 of 4.61 and p = 0.082).

In general, the mean time of negativization for the vaccinated was 11.07 ± 6.33 days (median value 10) compared to that of the unvaccinated 16.77± 8.87 days (median value 13), which is not quite significant ( p = 0.082) ( Figure 3 ).

However, there was also a significant interaction of disease and acute treatment on expression of IL-1β [ F (3,13) = 70.49, p < .0001] and TNFα [ F (3,13) = 16.76, p = .0013], whereas that for IFN-β was not quite significant [ F (3,13) = 3.54, p = .0825].

Multivariate analyses Nested analyses on the 4 chick level datasets showed a highly significant effect of box on chick enterobacterial load ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 11.4, P < 0.001), chick total bacteria ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 41, P < 0.001) and chick weight ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 7.97, P < 0.001), while box effect on chick fungal load was not quite significant ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 1.86, P = 0.083).

Interestingly, left NAcc showed relatively reduced activation during the Aversive Emotion Task ( M / SD = −4.14/23.89) compared to the Neutral Task ( M / SD = 2.08/20.73); however, the difference in activation was not quite significant ( F (1,65) = 3.10, p = 0.083, n p 2 = 0.045).

There is a close, but not quite significant, correlation ( r = 0.90, P = 0.083) between PRNFL swelling/atrophy and VEP amplitude loss.

T2DM was significantly more prevalent in patients with LOAD than in control subjects ( p < 0.0001), while the difference was not quite significant for hypertension ( p = 0.085).

Male sex showed a strong but not quite significant correlation with liver fibrosis (OR = 7.67, p = 0.085).

(F) Very significant effect of reboxetine [ F (1,23) = 9.95, p = 0.0044], not quite significant effect of caffeine [ F (1,23) = 3.23, p = 0.0857], and no interaction [ F (1,23) = 0.00, p = 0.9612].

The three-way generation x phase × time interaction was not quite significant, F (4,102) = 2.102, p = .086, η p 2 = 0.076.

While the difference in PC1 was not quite significant (p = 0.086), the difference in PC2 was significant (p = 0.037).

Differences which were not quite significant were also observed between benign and high-grade OC patients in the LRT (Fig. 4 B, unweighted UniFrac, p = 0.087), ovaries (Fig. 4 F, Bray–Curtis, p = 0.067) and urine (Fig. 4 J, Bray–Curtis, p = 0.056).

There was still some enhancing effect of PT on day 21 post-treatment, though this was not quite significant (P = 0.087 vs.

The decrease in V1b (from 0.157 to 0.135) was not quite significant (χ 2 = 872,130, unadjusted P = 0.0878); the same applied to PM (decrease from 0.167 to 0.152, χ 2 = 22,091, unadjusted P = 0.0737).

Although not quite significant, there was also some evidence for an improvement in OS (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.39-1.07]; P = .088).