“nearly statistically significant”

A single marker in FGF20 becomes nearly statistically significant ( P = 6.47 × 10 −05 ) when using only pathologically confirmed DLB cases.

The correlation between cancer worry and PANAS positive was nearly statistically significant at the 0.001-level ( p = 0.003), but the magnitude of effect was small ( r = 0.11, only 1.2% of the variance was shared).

Univariate Analysis The comparison between the MDR infection group and the MDR colonization group showed that there were statistically significant or nearly statistically significant differences in lymphoma type ( P = 0.005), lesion site ( P = 0.030), recent antibiotic use ( P = 0.008), albumin level ( P = 0.012), neutrophil count ( P = 0.045), chemotherapy duration ( P = 0.067), and catheter placement ( P = 0.089) between the two groups (Table 2 ).

Compared to steady high sleepers, the inverted U-shaped group showed a nearly statistically significant elevated risk in the fully adjusted model, with an HR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.07‐2.00; P =.02) in Model 3 ( Table 3 ).

However, in the additional outcomes assessed, the postintervention trend in proportion of testing sent as an isolated urine culture became nearly statistically significant (decrease of 3% per month, P = .05).

The use of prophylactic antibiotics was nearly statistically significant in the OS cohort (92% vs. 83.90%) ( p < 0.05).

The two Kaplan–Meier OS rates show a nearly statistically significant difference (p = 0.050; Fig. 3 ).

This difference was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.05), and this result was comparable to those in a previous study that revealed a lower rate of concurrent autoimmune diseases in MOGAD patients compared with seropositive AQP4-IgG patients. 13 Clinical Characteristics at ON Presentation In our study, the incidence of bilateral simultaneous ON was observed strikingly more frequently in the MOG-IgG + ON group compared with the AQP4-IgG + ON group (80% vs 8%, MOG-IgG + ON vs AQP4-IgG + ON patients, respectively; p < 0.001).

OCT2 showed a 2.45‐fold decrease, which was nearly statistically significant ( P = 0.05).

These findings resulted in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios of 2.72 and 4.36, respectively, with a nearly statistically significant difference ( p = 0.05; summarized in Table 3 and Table 5 A, and Figure 5 ).

The difference in the general perception of food risk between countries was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.050).

For the multivariate analysis, the variables included were those bearing clinical significance and those that were significant or nearly statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis.

Evaluations conducted in Australia were also associated with significant mean effects in reducing bullying victimization ( p < .05) and evaluations conducted in Finland and the United States were nearly statistically significant ( p = .05 and p = .06, respectively) under the random effects model.

According to Table 3 , the difference between the normal group and the OSA group was nearly statistically significant ( p < 0.05).

The current study showed that there was a nearly statistically significant difference in OS in patients receiving a pediatric regimen compared to other intensive regimens (p=0.05).

The aVR sign was nearly statistically significant as a predictor of SCD in Brugada patients (OR = 5.28, 95 % CI = 0.97–28.69, p = 0.05, I 2 = 87 %).

This difference was nearly statistically significant at the 0.05 level ( p = 0.0504), suggesting that police stops may have particularly salient effects on the mental health of youth.

Nonetheless, the NIG patients were relatively young compared to the non-NIG patients (64.7 years ± 12.0 versus 67.9 years ± 14.6), and this difference was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.051) ( Table 2 ).

Architectural atypia (AUS‐A) resulted in more UMP/NIFTP cases compared to the nuclear category (AUS‐N), and this association was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.051).

The main imaging findings showed no significant difference between the two subgroups, but the signal change consistent with focal infarct was nearly statistically significant (P = 0.051), as shown in Table 3 .

Post-hoc analysis did not identify a significant difference at any specific age, although 10 mos were nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.0510).

Furthermore, the PEEK cage group showed a nearly statistically significant better NDI compared to the Sulcem PMMA group ( P = 0.051) ( Table 3 ).

The median difference in typical HMS index values for S18 compared to S17 were nearly statistically significant (p‐value = 0.051).

This sentiment was also present among the faculty and was nearly statistically significant ( P = 0.0511).

Biofilm quantities on sample collection time point 77 remained elevated over pre-treatment (0) quantities and the comparison was nearly statistically significant (adjusted p-value = 0.0513).