Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Item 1 showed nearly significant illusionary effects in the minimum delay condition (score = 1.00±1.57, t(17) = 2.70, P = 0.06, corrected; P<0.01, uncorrected), but failed to show differences between conditions (F(5, 85) = 0.37, P>0.1).
nearly significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
This means a nearly significant ( P = 0.06) association of fever with this pathogen (3 of 18 [16.7%; 95% CI 3.6–41.4%] A. phagocytophilum -infected tick-bitten humans presenting with fever, whereas only 5 out of 126 [4%; 95% CI 1.3–9%] with symptoms relating to other tick-borne pathogens).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
More precisely, those who consumed fewer vegetables were 2.57 times more likely to be obese, although the association between vegetable intake frequency and obesity status was not statistically significant ( p > 0.05) before and after adjusting for stratifying variables, even though it was nearly significant among females ( p = 0.06) (Table 5 ).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
[ 20 ], in a 6-week trial, found no between group differences for change in absolute EI assessed by (24-hour diet record) in a sample of women randomized to morning ( n = 25) or evening ( n = 23) exercise, although the difference was nearly significant ( p = 0.06) with morning exercisers reducing EI by ~ 350 kcal/day and evening exercisers reducing EI ~ 30 kcal/day.
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In univariate analysis, ABCB1 c.4036A>G , AADAC c.841G>A genotypes and rifampicin dose were significant predictors of rifampicin C max ( p ≤ 0.05), and a nearly significant effect was observed for sex ( p = 0.06).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Finally, the analysis of AMPK active form per total protein levels ratio (p-AMPK Thr172 /AMPK) as an index of AMPK activation process, reveals a strong increase at 2 months (+1188%, p < 0.0001) that is nearly significant at 6 months (+275%, p = 0.06) but is not significantly different at 11 months in BVR-A −/− with respect to WT mice ( Figure 5 D.1).