Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Rm ANOVA showed a nearly significant difference in the Spectrum Level between the non-adapted and the adapted trials for ML and AP data combined [main effect, F (1, 19) = 3.9, p = 0.06], and the interaction between the non-adapted and adapted trials, and the ML and AP directions were significant [ F (1, 19) = 4.67, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.19].
nearly significantp = .061.2× alphagold
However, when taking into account the different classes of bears, that is, adult males, adult females, females with cubs, pregnant females, and subadults, den entry versus latitude was only significant for adult males ( n = 12, r = −.58, p = .05) and nearly significant for adult females ( n = 14, r = −.52, p = .06).
Denning in brown bears.
Ecol Evol · 2020 · PMC7381752
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
PSI was significantly correlated with CBCL total score (r = −0.37, p = 0.001), the CBCL internalizing score (r = −0.34, p = 0.002) and the SDQ total score (r = −0.44, p = 0.0001), whereas the relation with the CBCL externalizing score was nearly significant (r = −0.21, p = 0.06).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Surprisingly, γ-tocopherol, a form of vitamin E, was highly significantly and positively associated with T2D (final adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3–1.7; p<0.001) in two cohorts (adjusted OR of 1.8 and 1.6; p = 0.02 and 0.01 for 1999–2000 and 2001–2002 cohorts) and nearly significant in the two others (adjusted OR of 1.3 and 1.6; p = 0.06 and 0.04 for 2001–2002 and 2005–2006 cohorts).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The percentage difference that indicates the degree of asymmetry between the dominant and non dominant leg, was compared between the two groups and the height of vertical CMJ was nearly significant (p = 0.06). 3.2 The bilateral CMJ of the groups The comparison between the two groups showed a significantly higher bilateral CMJ of the volleyball players (p = 0.045) and a significantly higher energy expenditure (p < 0.001) as well as time to flight (0.039).