“nearly significant”

In the Treat 3 D group, the correlation was nearly significant, r treat 3 D = − 0.38 ( p = 0.02 ) .

When performing Cox regression, including the three significant (or nearly significant) parameters, all of them were still significant (age, p = 0.02; initial PSA, p < 0.001; T-stage, p = 0.03).

Associations between the 5 SBP trajectory groups and WMH or FA were significant or nearly significant for tracts in the left but not the right hemisphere ( Supplementary Table 3 ) and were stronger for WMH in the left uncinate fasciculus ( P = 0.02) and for FA in the left superior longitudinal fasciculus ( P = 0.008).Compared with the group with normal SBP and previously stable trajectories, the other 4 trajectory groups had a greater probability of having WMH greater than or equal to the median in the left uncinate fasciculus ( Table 4 ) and had greater FA in the left superior longitudinal fasciculus, independent of age, antihypertensive medication use, and stroke ( Table 4 ).

In WM, when using PMI as the sole covariate, relative retardance demonstrated a nearly significant negative trend in AD ( p = 0.021), whereas CTE exhibited a non‐significant negative trend ( p = 0.980).

First, we compared the No gap and Gap factor = −1⁄2 for each of the SOA conditions (except the 0-ms SOA that is shared across Gap factors), and found a significant difference for SOAs of −120, +60 and +120 ms (p<0.003 for all) and a nearly significant difference for −60 ms SOAs (p = 0.023).

Although both challenge viruses induced RNAemia in each of the vaccine groups, duration was reduced compared with that in the control group, and this reduction was significant or nearly significant for the AS03 A and AS03 B groups after DENV-1 challenge ( P = 0.024 and P = 0.053, respectively; both approximately 3 days decrease).

We observed a nearly significant causal association between FMet levels and MNBAC within the cohort of 1,400 metabolites ( P = 0.024, odds ratio (OR) = 3.22; 95% CI [1.16–8.92]).

Post hoc Bonferroni tests reveal the caudal group has a significantly greater proportion of boxes receiving 11 inputs ( P < 0.0033, t = 3.385) and a nearly significant difference for 10-input boxes (0.05 > P > 0.025, familywise-adjusted α = 0.0033, t = 2.278).

Within-group analyses showed significant or nearly significant improvements ( p = 0.025 for the TT group and p = 0.061 for the ST group) [ 16 ].

Subgroups with notable significance are as follows: Age: Significant in the 40—59 age group (OR = 1.21, 95%CI 1.05—1.98, P = 0.01) and nearly significant in the 60 + group (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.01,1.29, P = 0.03).

The nearly significant interaction effect was a result of a significant difference in Warmth-Cold D -scores between the groups “women” and “men” ( M diff = 15, p = 0.03), and only between these two groups.

Results: The preliminary results of the study (evaluated on the 75% of patients who concluded the study) show how in the active treatment phases it can be observed a significant or nearly significant change in the following parameters: percentage of 24 hour diastolic blood pressure records over the normal: Reduction from 29 ± 24% to 23 ± 20% (p = 0.03); daytime systolic blood pressure: Reduction from 128 ± 12 to 125 ± 12 mmHg (p = 0.05); daytime diastolic blood pressure: Reduction from 80 ± 9 to 78 ± 9 mmHg (p = 0.06); daytime mean blood pressure: Reduction from 97 ± 10 to 94 ± 10 mmHg (p = 0.04); percentage of day diastolic blood pressure records over the normal: Reduction from 35 ± 28% to 28 ± 24% (p = 0.04).

P1-N1 suppression was also nearly significant at T 1 from 5 to 9 minutes following cTBS (paired t -test, p=0.03).

However, with the PP strategy, the Group by Time interactions were nearly significant for night‐TWT, night‐SOL and night‐SE ( p = 0.03, 0.02 and 0.04, respectively), with corresponding between‐group ESs of −0.70, −0.77 and 0.68, respectively, suggesting that these three nighttime variables must be monitored in other studies.

Small interaction effects of group by object in hand closing time (F (3.4, 49.9) = 6.27; p = .00; η G 2 = .04), total grasp time (F (4.2, 61.3) = 7.63; p = .00; η G 2 = .04), and nearly significant synchrony at end (p = .03) revealed that a higher object stiffness resulted in a faster performance in the DG and COM groups, while the performance of the IG was about equal for the four objects (Figure 5 B).

Significant and nearly significant genetic correlations were found between PLR and platelet count (r=0.4565, p = 0.0309) and between PLR and lymphocyte count (r=-0.4858, p=0.0701) Table 6 ).

[ 20 ] reported a nearly significant association was found between the AG genotype and KOA in female patients (OR = 2.65; 95% CI = 0.99-7.19; P = 0.031).

These effects were specific for the occasional users as indicated by a significant or nearly significant THC × cannabis use history interaction for the number of control losses ( F 1,44 = 4.900, p = 0.032), RT ( F 1,43 = 3.945, p = 0.053), and number of hits ( F 1,43 = 4.425, p = 0.042).

KS distances are larger (0.032–0.038), and likelihood ratio tests consistently favored the lognormal distribution, with negative R values and significant or nearly significant p -values (e.g., R = −4.49 at TM ≥ 20%, p = 0.033; R = −2.52 at TM ≥ 100%, p = 0.075).

Only the differences in the correct judgement of 'using ice compresses' and 'using warm compresses' were nearly significant, with nurses in the NPS group more likely to judge these measures correctly (p = 0.034 and p = 0.039, respectively).

High tea consumption during the dawn‐to‐noon and noon‐to‐afternoon periods demonstrated nearly significant positive associations on eGFR, with regression coefficients of 1.6474 ( p = 0.0390) and 1.7664 ( p = 0.0261), respectively.

Visual patterns reflected significant differences between years, with pairwise comparisons revealing no significant differences in benthic communities between 2015 and 2016 ( p = 0.79), yet significant and nearly significant differences between 2015 and 2020 ( p = 0.04) and 2016 and 2020 ( p = 0.06), respectively (Fig. 3 , Table S3).

Three studies showed a significant or nearly significant trend towards a decrease in nuclear cataract risk with increased duration of multivitamin/mineral supplementation ( p = 0.04, p = 0.02, and p = 0.08, respectively) [ 8 , 10 , 19 ].

Although the interaction terms of IOP*MD at diagnosis were nearly significant ( p = 0.04), the interaction term of IOP*VFI at diagnosis was not significant ( p = 0.24), likely due to the presence of collinearity between predictors.

Only a nearly significant interaction between SNP and TEI on insulin levels was evident ( p = 0.04).