Results indicated very similar path analyses with a single difference between them, regarding the path between family income and a sense of danger which was significant for the first model ( p = .005) but only nearly significant for the second model ( p = .06).
← all phrases
“nearly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.0579p=0.06
In the literature
We observed that patients with rMBC had a lower age (44 ± 12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.2–48.8) compared with dMBC (49 ± 10; 95% CI: 46–52) at the time of metastatic presentation, which was nearly significant ( p = 0.06).
A decrease (or nearly significant decrease) in CNR was observed on Dixon in phase images at 6 and 8 weeks relative to both baseline ( P = .06 for 6 weeks, P = .04 for 8 weeks) and 2 weeks ( P = .04 for 6 weeks, P = .03 for 8 weeks).
Interestingly, when verbal ability was included in the models, the beta for the GET became nearly significant, β = .157, p = .060, whereas the beta for the ET became non-significant, β = .061, p = .508, revealing that, when verbal ability is controlled for, the GET is correlated with age whereas the ET is not.
A nearly significant Condition × Time interaction was observed for Anxiety ( p = 0.06).
amphibian human‐modified habitats maladaptation road salt roads Dartmouth College National Science Foundation DEB-1655092 Severo Ochoa Fundación Ramón Areces Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad The nuptial pads of male frogs were more abundant on individuals from roadside populations (2.83 ± 0.07 mm) compared to woodland populations (2.63 ± 0.07 mm), a difference that was nearly significant after accounting for variation due to forearm length (ANOVA F 1,129 = 3.73, p = 0.06; effect of limb length p = 0.0001; Figure 3 c).
This ES was robust in the sensitivity analysis but became nearly significant (p = 0.06) after the omission of the studies by Demirci [ 43 ], Duranti et al.
Regarding MDSC, there was a significant direct correlation between M‐MDSC percentage and CD4 + T cell proliferation inhibition, and a nearly significant correlation with CD8 + T cell proliferation inhibition ( p = 0.06).
2 We found that of these predictors, only low prevalence search performance, t = 9.99, p < 0.001, β = 0.70, accounted for a significant portion of high prevalence performance, while extraversion was a nearly significant predictor, t = 1.9, p = 0.06, β = 0.12.
warm) was a significant or nearly significant ( P < 0.06) effector of flexibility in metabolic traits for two of eight tests for BMR flexibility, for three of six tests for M sum flexibility, and for two of six tests for metabolic scope flexibility (Table S1 ).
When analysing all MO patients, lymph node status was the single most powerful predictor of DFS, followed by PgR status and tumour size. INT2/HSTI amplification was retained in the model as a nearly significant variable (P = 0.060) with a relative risk of 1.7 for amplified tumours.
However, comparisons of Δs between RE and NRE groups were only significant for ΔLy and ΔNe% [nearly significant (P=0.06) for ΔNe%-Ly% and ΔLy%].
Effects of age and treatments on fasting plasma insulin, HOMA-IR and RMR A nearly significant effect of treatment on fasting insulin was revealed (dF = 2/26, F = 3.141, p = 0.06), while no significant effect of age was found (dF = 1/26, F = 1.722, p = 0.201), nor was a crossed effect found (dF = 2/26, F = 1.856, p = 0.176) ( Table 1 ).
HDL concentration in the CON-group was nearly significant (p = 0.06) as opposed to pre exercise values ( Table 1 ).
Result The use of genetic proxies for HMGCR inhibition demonstrated a significant association with a decreased risk of migraine in the FinnGen dataset (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46–0.88, p = 0.0006) and a nearly significant association in the Choquet dataset (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60–1.01, p = 0.06).
As we had already reported in our previous paper [ 19 ], there was a significant decrease in need satisfaction for belonging, F (1,14) = 19.64, p = .001, η p 2 = .58, self-esteem, F (1,14) = 4.89, p = .04, η p 2 = .26, and control, F (1,14) = 7.21, p = .02, η p 2 = .34, and a nearly significant reduction for meaningful existence, F (1,14) = 4.12, p = .06, η p 2 = .23, after exclusion in the Cyberball group.
The C allele was predominantly found in the patients group, nearly significant ( p =0.06) ( Table 5 ).
distributed cued) revealed no main effect of attention condition, F (1) = 1.10, p = 0.34; an effect of visual area, F (3) = 3.28, p = 0.05; and a nearly significant interaction, F (3) = 3.14, p = 0.06.
The relationship between mPFC activation and this composite sleep score was nearly significant (b = 0.16, p = .06) suggesting that it may have not been the use of sleep medication per se that accounted for this relationship.
A nearly significant ( p < .06) discrepancy emerged between rural and urban infants, in which approximately 19.9% (70,224 weighted households) of rural infant households had no health insurance compared to 16.8% (502,053 weighted households) of urban infant households.
Among all the moderating factors, only the participants level of expertise (experts or novices) showed a nearly significant difference (Q(1) =3.59, p = 0.06).
001) were significantly different, and change in first-aid skills for treating a tracheal foreign body were nearly significant ( P = . 06).
Although only nearly significant ( p = 0.06), we have found a positive association between the total number of days on parenteral nutrition and abundance of Enterobacter spp. at d + 28.
The sum of errors between both conditions was nearly significant with higher error rates for semantics in comparison to emotions ( t (20) = 2.01, p = 0.06). 3.2.
Concerning OS, we observed a strong and nearly significant ( p = 0.06) reduction in hazard ratio (HR = 0.43, CI: 0.18–1.04) for BRAF patients.