3.41 ± 0.99) and a nearly significant ( p = 0.058) higher overall HU-DBI score (7.70 ± 1.31 vs . 7.27 ± 1.47), respectively ( Table 6 ).
← all phrases
“nearly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.0579p=0.06
In the literature
In the non-cirrhotic patients, dose reduction (without discontinuation) had no impact on the SVR whereas there was a nearly significant effect in cirrhtoics (12 % with full dose vs 7-8% for dose reduction; p = .058).
Using a general linear mixed model, the results for osteocytes anisotropy (L2/L3) and SMI were clearer with a statistically significant p-value = 0.048 for L2/L3 and nearly significant for SMI p-value = 0.058, as shown in Fig.
The left-right inter-hemispheric density (i.e., the density of connections between left and right hemispheres) difference was also nearly significant ( p = 0.058), but the anterior-posterior inter-hemispheric density (i.e., the density of connections between nodes in the anterior and posterior halves of the full network) was not found to differ significantly between the groups ( p = 0.954).
It should be noted that the baseline difference in comorbidities between the experimental group and the control group was nearly significant ( P = 0.058).
FPD change also showed a significant interaction between treatment and beak saturation change ( p = 0.034), and a nearly significant interaction between treatment and beak brightness change ( p = 0.058), but neither remained significant after multiple test correction.
ΔSUVmax% was nearly significant as a predictive factor (odds ratio 3.60, 95% CI 0.95–13.6, P = 0.0586).
They also noted a nearly significant improvement of the mMMSE for the full analysis set (p=0.0587) and for the MMSE <25 strata (p=0.061), with no such findings for the MMSE >25 strata.
In addition, a nearly significant increase was observed in the dentate gyrus ( p = 0.0588), again at 9 months compared to 2 months (Bregma −1.70).
However, the univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for age and sex, the AA genotype of MLH3 rs170580 showed a nearly significant difference ( p = 0.059 and p = 0.066, respectively; OR < 1; Fig.
A nearly significant difference was also found between the second phase BATR PEx and the last phase BATR PAc (mean difference = −0.164, SE = 0.068, t(29) = −2.374, p = 0.059, d = −0.176).
Testing for the enrichment of proteins associated with either the non-canonical or the canonical WNT pathway revealed a significant ( p = 0.047) or nearly significant ( p = 0.059) overrepresentation, respectively.
Two-way ANOVA of the data indicated a nearly significant effect of genotype on the percent active responses (F 1,19 = 4.02, p = 0.059).
However, total DOM intensity had an inverse and nearly significant correlation ( r = −0.689, p = 0.059 ) with minimum paid wages in the studied countries (Table S3 ).
For male offspring, one of the two populations that showed only ONT priming had nearly significant TG priming (population AM, Figure 5 b; p = .059).
Association with N-classification was nearly significant ( p = 0.059).
There was a trend which was nearly significant for the sum of all items increasing with education (p = 0.059) (completed primary education mean (SD) = 113 (10) /completed secondary education mean (SD) = 114(11) / attending college/university mean (SD) = 123 (5), completed bachelor’s degree mean (SD) = 120 (11)).
For the 10 Panama strains assayed for both DNA-repair capacity and embryo UVB tolerance, there is a nearly significant positive correlation between the two phenotypes (Spearman correlation: r = 0.612; p = 0.059) despite the fact that the primary types of damage induced by the two treatments are different.
We detected a nearly significant decrease in the apoptotic level of 42.5% (0.4188 vs. 0.7286, p = 0.059) after the injection of exosomes from SI (0 Gy).
Post-hoc paired t -tests showed a nearly significant difference between active and sham tDCS in male participants ( t 16 = 2.03, p = 0.059), but not in females ( t 20 = − 1.34, p = 0.195).
The main effect of Time of learning was nearly significant (F(1,21) = 3.99, p = 0.059) with a better recall performance in the evening-learning group (11.78±7.54; 42.07%±26.93%) than in the morning-learning group (6.43±3.18; 22.96%±11.36%).
Differences over 4- and 8-hour increments using another three samples from the same species were nearly significant (Student’s paired t test, t 2 = 3.9, P = 0.059), with all three decreasing by an average of 8% of the 4-hour value (fig.
Whereas similar HAFK values were observed for the dominant leg between soccer and basketball young players (mean difference = -0.08%; p = 0.98), nearly significant differences were observed for the non-dominant leg (mean difference = 5.36%; p = 0.059).
During sessions 5–6, the preference for the demonstrated over the alternative rewarding cue was nearly significant (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, n = 19, p = 0.059), and as mentioned earlier ( figure 2 and above), it was clearly significant by the last two sessions of the experiments.
23 95%CI 0–62; HR 2.339, 95%CI 1.159–4.719, p = 0.018), while former good histologic response to primary chemotherapy (necrosis ≥ 90%) showed a nearly significant correlation with improved survival [median OS 19 (95%CI 15–22) vs. 13 months (95%CI 9–17); HR 0.527 (95%CI 0.271–1.025), p = 0.059].