Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Post-hoc analysis revealed nearly significant differences between control and prediabetic patients ( p = 0.055) while the difference between prediabetic patients and diabetic patients on insulin was statistically significant ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 2 ).
nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Thus, although when compared with control group, GLAST expression remained invariable after chronic ethanol intake ( p = 0.6550), a significant reduction of around 37% was detected under abstinence conditions ( p = 0.0018) and a nearly significant reduction when compared with the ethanol group ( p = 0.055).
nearly significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Results were different for HiS rats: Preference in the polycose gelatin test was strongly correlated with preference in both the saccharin gelatin and the fluid test, r s(11) = 0.84 and 0.74, respectively, and the correlation between saccharin gelatin and fluid preferences was nearly significant, r (11) = 0.54, P = 0.055.
nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
A two-way repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of concentration [F­(1.166, 24.49) = 256.0, p < 0.001] and a significant treatment × concentration interaction [F­(8, 84) = 2.216, p = 0.034] with a nearly significant effect of treatment [F­(2, 21) = 3.350, p = 0.055] on inhibition of DA uptake ( Figure E).
nearly significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Repeat Measurement Analysis of Variance of 2 (Gender: Male, Female) × 2 (Social Distance: Itimacy, Strangeness) × 2 (Symmetry of Punishments: Symmetric Punishment, Asymmetric Punishment) Performed for Defection Rate The results of repeated measures ANOVA showed that the main effect of gender was nearly significant, with F (1,77) = 3.784, P = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.047, and observed power = 0.384, indicating that the non-cooperation rate of men (0.374) was slightly lower than that of women (0.424).