Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
AS Mothers Display a Higher Methylation Level Than ADHD and Healthy Control Mothers The mean percentage of methylation among the three groups was significantly different for the HTR1A and the RELN genes (F = 14.080, p = 0, n = 2; F = 8.240, p = 0, n = 2, respectively), nearly significant for the MTHFR gene (F = 2.978, p = 0.054, n = 2) and not significant for the BDNF gene ( Table 2 and Figure 1 ).
nearly significantp =0.0541.1× alphagold
Following 7 days of treatment in subjects with MDD, a 1 : 1 ratio of BUP and SAM, the ratio associated with maximal antagonism of opioid effects, exhibited statistically significant improvement vs placebo in HAM-D17 total score ( p =0.032) and nearly significant improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ( p =0.054).
Evaluation of opioid modulation in major depressive disorder.
Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015 · PMC4397403
nearly significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
As can be expected following the results above, following the intervention in English significantly larger gains are observed in English ( M = 0.27) than in Hebrew ( M = 0.05) for target words that were taught in English, t (21) = 5.93, p < 0.001, and following the intervention in Hebrew larger gains are observed in Hebrew ( M = 0.11) than in English ( M = 0.02) for target words that were taught in Hebrew, and the difference was nearly significant, t (21) = 2.04, p = 0.054.
nearly significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
On multivariable Cox regression, only procedure type (combined and transcranial approaches) remained significant prognosticators [HR:8.616, p = 0.004, and HR: 17.559, p = 0.017, respectively] with Kadish-Morita Stage D being nearly significant [HR:14.35, p = 0.054].
nearly significantP = .0541.1× alphagold
Notably, the P value for interaction was nearly significant ( P = .054) between subgroups of patients who had received previous hormonal therapy (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]) and those who had not received previous hormonal therapy (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.23]).