Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Total energy intake decreased significantly in the intervention group by 32.4% (-757.23 ± 663.27 kcal, P < 0.001), while the control group had a less pronounced reduction of 16.7% (-380.88 ± 573.68 kcal, P = 0.055), with a nearly significant between-group difference ( P = 0.052).
nearly significantP =0.0521.0× alphagold
Among them, five articles showed that the sodium restriction group had a higher degree of improvement in quality of life than the control group ( 9 – 11 , 13 , 18 ); one study showed that there was a nearly significant change ( P =0.052) in quality of life in the control group compared to the sodium restriction group ( 14 ).
nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
However, when using Cramer's Phi as effect size parameter, relevant associations between COR week 5 improvement and clinical outcome (response rate, remission rate) could be shown for the reboxetine group which were nearly significant (response rate: Phi = 0.435; p = 0.052; remission rate: Phi = 0.546; p = 0.051), whereas no such association were seen in the mirtazapine group ( Table 3 ).
nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Significant pre–post differences were detected in rounds 1, 3, and 5 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p ≤ 0.05), while no significant effect was detected in rounds 2 ( p ≥ 0.05) and was nearly significant in round 4 ( p = 0.052), although the number of samples in these rounds was relatively lower, which may have reduced statistical power ( Figure 5 ).
nearly significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The UKPDS ( 133 ) had a severe hypoglycemia rate of 1.8%/year in the intensive control versus 0.7%/year in the standard control group, with a modest and nearly significant reduction in CVD event rate ( P = 0.052) in the intensive group.
nearly significantP = .0521.0× alphagold
Although no significant differences in clinical indicators were observed between the 5 true-positive and 2 false-positive category 3 lesions, PSAdt showed a nearly significant trend (6.24 vs 16.0 months, P = .052; data not shown), suggesting that a more rapid PSA increase may indicate a greater probability of true-positive findings in equivocal lesions.