Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

However, since the permutation test was nearly significant, we calculated the test between the two factors, which showed a stronger and more broadly tuned serial dependence from targets than from non-targets (amplitude difference = 2.28°, p < 0.001 , d est = 1.042; w difference: −0.070, equals FWHM difference: 26.97°, p < 0.001 , d est = 1.359), but emphasize that this result should be interpreted cautiously.
Further exploring the specific effects of Fmr1 and IP3R2 genotype on the nearly significant group differences with a two-way ANOVA of seizure score, we found that, consistent with our previous Fmr1 KO cohort and many previously published studies, there was a main effect of Fmr1 genotype on seizure score ( F (1, 72) = 7.35, p = .008; Fig. 7B ).
Postoperative endoleak could occur in 8% of the cases, and mid-term stent-graft patency rate might remain in 93%, although covered stent presented a nearly significant decrease in postoperative endoleak, a significant decrease in reintervention and overall late complication, as compared to bare metal stents.[ 5 ] CONCLUSION Treatment of ECAAs is indicated mainly to prevent thromboembolic events caused by intra-aneurysmal thrombi.
While there was no significant difference across the three immersion times, there was a nearly significant difference between T1 and T3 [ 27 ], indicating that these groups were already well established during the first incubation period (30 days) because they did not find any variations in the composition of the fungal community between incubation periods.
The relationship between intervention 2 compared to 0 was nearly significant in both the crude and adjusted analysis (OR = 2.30, 95% CI [0.97-5.48], Adjusted OR = 2.37, 95% CI [0.99-5.67] respectively), hence among women who had their 1 st ANC visit in the 2 nd trimester of their pregnancy, women who were in the APAS and resided in the MVP cluster had twice the odds of going for more, rather than less, ANC visits compared to women who were not in the APAS and resided outside the MVP cluster (power = 0.58).