Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearing significance”

226 sentences · 226 papers · 262 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.051

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearing significanceP =.071.4× alphagold
In Study 1, respondents with higher levels of digital HISB for self had significantly higher perceptions of severity ( β =.22, P <.001), self-efficacy ( β =.15, P =.02), and response efficacy ( β =.25, P <.001) as well as, at nearing significance, higher perceptions of susceptibility ( β =.11, P =.07).
nearing significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
The same interaction was nearing significance for procedural decision performance ( t (72.18) = − 1.82, p = 0.07 for the lapses in the two-choice reaction task—see Fig. 3 ) and vigilance performance (PVT lapses: t (93.13) = − 1.76 , p = 0.08, see Fig. 4 ) but disappeared almost completely for Simple Reaction times ( t (90.67) = − 0.79, p = 0.434).
nearing significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
A paired t-test conducted on the individual average values of the total duration of the maneuver to investigate a potential overall time-saving gain in Rough sea between the Control and Addition modalities indicated a decrease, nearing significance, in the total duration of the maneuver (47.8 ± 9.6 vs. 43.9 ± 10.5 sec., t(15) = 1.59, p = 0.07) between the Control and Addition modalities in Rough sea .
nearing significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
However, ridge regression analysis revealed that the effect of the intervention on diet adherence was nearing significance ( p = 0.07); the effect of family support on this outcome was also nearing significance ( p = 0.06).
nearing significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
6 ) as predictors revealed that only GDP was a significant predictor of HEC ( r 2 = 0.492, F 1,10 = 9.7, p = 0.011; 95% confidence intervals of slope = 0.0826 to 0.5001; see equation 2), with only latitude nearing significance ( t = 2.04, p = 0.072; all other variables | t values| < 1.01, p values > 0.34).
nearing significancep = 0.0761.5× alphagold
They did not obtain any statistical significance in the probiotic group versus the control group in Crohn’s disease ( Figure S2 ); however, their results were more promising in relation to UC, nearing significance ( p = 0.076), and the post hoc analyses showed that levels of faecal calprotectin were significantly reduced ( p < 0.015) in patients with UC who received the probiotic instead of the placebo.
nearing significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
On the other hand, if the K content in control plants was about 3.5 g/kg ( Figure 8 ), featuring a C/K ratio of roughly 3, in stressed plants it was higher than 8 g/kg, leading to a net rise of 2.5 g/kg (p< 0.01) and an interaction effect between biotic and nutritional stress nearing significance (p = 0.08). 3.2.6.2 Mesonutrients The level of Ca in control plants was approximately 400 mg/kg based on FW, as reported in Table 1 .