“near to significance”

The effect of context on first fixation duration in non HC using partnered women was near to significance, t (19) = 2.09, p = .05.

Concerning like scores, a Kruskal-Wallis rank test showed a very near to significance difference according to Strategy [ H (5) = 10.99, p = 0.05].

There was no main effect of hearing loss on difficulty, F (2,43) = 2.100, p = .135, η p 2 = .089 or on effort, F (2,43) = 1.932, p = .157, η p 2 = .082, but there was an effect near to significance on frustration, F (2,43) = 3.100, p = .052, η p 2 = .129.

Despite it is not significant, in the extended model the empathy factor is near to significance (z = 1.93, p = 0.053).

The relationship between groups and z-score BMI at two years was near to significance ( P = 0.053).

The global p -value ( Table 2 , the test used is explained in Appendix B.2 ) only shows a value that comes near to significance ( p = 0.055) for phase III. 3.9.

There was a near to significance main effect of Learning Condition [ F (1,19) = 4.2, p = 0.055] showing that the orthography of target PWs was more accurately learned in the spelling aloud learning condition than in the handwriting learning condition.

Age at onset between 13 and 24 months prevailed in the cases with regression of development at onset (44.4%) compared with cases with stagnation (26.7%) and delay (18.8%): this result was near to significance ( p = 0.057).

Finally, no significant within-group changes in total body BMD were reported in our meta-analysis, although a p -value near to significance was obtained ( p = 0.057).

The continuous NLR and PLR values were then grouped (with cut-offs of 3.02 and 6.82, respectively); results of univariate models on NLR (≤3.02/>3.02) and PLR (≤6.82/>6.82) groups indicated that although NLR was near to significance (p = 0.057), PLR was statistically significant ( Table 5 C; p = 0.034). 4.

The relationships between the number of oocytes and metals: iron ( r s =0.303; p =0.003) and calcium ( r s =−0.276; p =0.007) are significant, as well as between the number of mature oocytes with iron ( r s =0.319; p =0.002), calcium ( r s =−0.307; p =0.003) and sodium ( r s =−0.215; p =0.039) and are near to significance in the case of aluminium ( r s =−0.198; p =0.057).

Nevertheless, we observed positive correlations for tim (p = 0.024) and with a p near to significance value in ace (p = 0.057) when Colombia was included.

The only interaction term near to significance ( p = 0.058; F-test justified omission from final model; Table 2 ) was the interaction between temperature and thiacloprid pointing towards a lower relative reduction in gammarid feeding at 20°C relative to 16°C.

There was near to significance ( P = 0.058) difference seen between the qualities of the four types of rotary endodontic files.

Beta diversity was near to significance ( P = 0.058) with myopathy birds exhibiting greater sample-to-sample dissimilarity ( Figure 4B ).

However, in the 9 individuals of the conv group as well as in the 9 treated individuals receiving mAb, BMI positively correlated with nasal anti-S1-IgA and nasal anti-RBD IgG antibodies ( Supplementary Figure 4B and Supplementary Table 11 ), with IC50 against Wuhan-type SARS-CoV-2 and near to significance with anti-spike-IgG concentrations (p=0.058).

Sepsis was near to significance (OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 0.94–28; P=0.058).

Indeed, we noticed a considerable increase in BDNF mRNA levels ( p < 0.0001) and a value near to significance for Fgf-2 ( p = 0.059) in irisin-treated mice compared to controls.

Nevertheless, cadence of 105 b·min −1 showed a value near to significance ( p = 0.06, d = 0.51). 4.

This may be due to the disparity between the screen viewing distance and the individual's convergence.[ 26 ] However, in the current study, there was no significant association between screen distance and DES among the children in the multivariate analysis, but in univariate analysis, the association was near to significance ( P = 0.06).

On the other side, from our whole cell preparation, we observe a 30 % increase in Notch1 transcripts, which is near to significance ( p =0.06) (Fig. 8 d ).

Considering all observational study groups together, CaMean was significantly correlated with MS/BS (R=-0.31, p<0.01), showed a near to significance correlation with BFR/BV (R=-0.23, p=0.06), and it was not significantly related to MAR (p=0.74, n.s.).

The results showed neither triple interaction nor other effects, but only a main effect near to significance ( P = 0.06) for condition and performance in the time window from −1 to 0 sec.

There were also no male holding behaviors observed during the first month of pregnancy, but a comparison of the pre-conceptive period versus the second month of pregnancy revealed an effect near to significance (LRT: X 2 = 3.45, Δdf = 3, P = 0.063, see Table C in S1 File for further details), with the probability of observing males performing holding behaviors significantly decreasing during the second month of pregnancy (GLMM: z = -2.00, P = 0.045, see Table D in S1 File for further details).

EW was near to significance (p = 0.07) being lower for homozygous Ala/Ala (36.1 ± 9.2 kg) compared with wild type (38.7 ± 12.2 kg) and heterozygous (42.1 ± 13.6 kg) subjects.