“near statistical significance”

Mice in the Day 31–45-only treatment group (Group E) experienced a 40% survival rate (4-fold of control) that is near statistical significance compared with the radiation + vehicle group ( p = 0.08).

The presence of optic disc tilting was near statistical significance, with TC variants at SNP rs112369934 more likely to have disc tilt (8.8% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.08).

Lymphocyte% decreased in Cluster 4 and reached near statistical significance ( P = 0.08).

These differences were near statistical significance (Figure 4 A; P = 0.0803).

The difference between the three groups in mortality rate was near statistical significance ( p = 0.083).

Other data showed that the presence of diarrhea in the clinical picture was significantly associated with prolonged viral RNA clearance time ( P = 0.042), and so was muscular pain with a near statistical significance ( P = 0.085).[ 16 ] In contrast, other authors observed that patients with a mild form of COVID-19 had prolonged RNA clearance time compared to those with a severe form of COVID-19.

The fibrous markers COL1A2 and VCAN in the COL bioink were higher than in 7030 bioinks with near statistical significance (i.e., p = 0.086 and p = 0.077, respectively).

In the mice of the P group, plasma LCFA species had a strong positive and statistically significant relationship to their liver LCFA counterparts (r=0.96, p <0.01), the comparison in the mice of the A group revealed also a fairly strong positive correlation that was near statistical significance (r=0.8, p =0.09), while the comparison in the C group showed moderate positive correlation relationship (r=0.6) between plasma and liver LCFA.

We also found that the prevalence of FPL in circumcised MSM was lower (28%) than that in uncircumcised men (49%); this was near statistical significance (p = 0.09), but power to assess this association was low due to the low number of circumcised MSM in our cohort (n = 18).

Variables that showed either a significant result (p<0.05) or were near statistical significance (p<0.1) were included in the multivariate stepwise logistic regression model to determine those independently related to end-points.

Variables that showed near statistical significance (p<0.1) were included in the multivariate stepwise logistic regression model to determine those independently related to end-points.

While our analysis suggests that spine length differences did not drive these sex effects, certain SEX × CONDITION interactions did near statistical significance (0.05 < P < 0.10) for ROM LU and %ROM LU (see Figure 5 – upper plots) variables.

Variables that showed either a significant result or were near statistical significance (p<0.1) were included in the multivariate stepwise logistic regression model to determine the factors that were independently related to end-points.

Only domain of prioritization was found to be near statistical significance ( p = .106); hence, model building for multivariate analysis was not carried out.

Other factors, such as open bladder cuff excision ( p = 0.119), multifocal ureteric tumours ( p = 0.137), and post-RNU bladder instillation of chemotherapy ( p = 0.064), were included in the multivariate analysis model as they were of near statistical significance ( p < 0.2).

However, when this parameter (IMT) was corrected for differences in arterial diameter (WCSA), this near statistical significance disappeared ( P = 0.21).

Compliance with daily weight measurements ( β =–.20; t 54 =–1.580; P =.12) was near statistical significance, whereas engagement with the Keyto app ( β =–.14; t 54 =–1.069; P =.29) and average Keyto Levels ( β =–.06; t 54 =–0.469; P =.64) were not identified as statistically significant predictors.

Crucially, however, that small effect was itself significantly different (p ≈ 0.032) in comparison to what we observed in sentences with ungrammatical syntax, where there was a numeric trend in the opposite direction (0.5% higher accuracy) that was nowhere near statistical significance (p ≈ 0.76).

Contrary to expectations and other studies [ 35 ], these findings suggest that differences in overkilling between intimate victims (52.1%; n = 25) and strangers or acquaintances (37.1%; n = 13) were only near statistical significance (OR = 1.84; 95% CI = 0.756–4.48).

For example, it seems likely that the strong association between CCNE1 amplification and Ov.RS2 contribution in the AOCS cohort is responsible for the near statistical significance of the association between Ov.RS3 contribution and CCNE1 amplification.

Moreover, compared with the reported models, the CjBM showed near statistical significance in identifying rapid radiographic progression; adding BERS can improve the discrimination of the original reported model ( P DeLong =0.035).

mRRs increased considerably and reached near statistical significance regardless of the study quality dimension used except for the analyses stratified by AML significance level, where formal statistical significance was reached for the two highest quality strata.

However, statistical significance was lost for the 3-year to 6-year visit change and otherwise attenuated to near statistical significance in the diabetic group only ( Table 3 , models 3 and 4).

The two factors ‘age’ and ‘susceptible to motion sickness’ were of near statistical significance in the univariate analysis, but the multivariate analysis indicated that neither was a risk factor (Table 3 ).

In particular, VA was associated with CERT1, with the association of FRS with CERT1 being near statistical significance.