“near statistical significance”

We found a correlation near statistical significance ( p = 0.056) between the mean values and the preoperative VAS scores ( r = −0.190).

Near statistical significance was also a concordance between positions of strains in the tree and patient response to metronidazole treatment (p = 0.056).

These differences in average positive and net biological ankle power were near statistical significance ( P =0.056 and P =0.057, respectively).

Margin status was near statistical significance on univariate analysis ( p = 0.056) only when considered as a gross margin, as it is typically used in nomogram prediction and was included in the multivariate analysis.

Latency was significantly higher in adult males compared to young males and of near statistical significance in adult males compared to adult females ( p = 0.056).

The differences were near statistical significance (p = 0.056 and p = 0.051, respectively).

Survival was improved in the treatment group (26-48 days) to near statistical significance ( P =0.0566), but all mice ultimately succumbed to disease ( Figure 5B ).

TNFSF13 was near statistical significance with SKAT in the filter with all the rare variants included in the test (p = 0.057), but this gene did not meet the inclusion criteria with the other two filters (Table 5 ).

In the Czech registry, 26 there were no differences in survival rates between the anti-TNF agents, although the difference between etanercept and infliximab was near statistical significance ( P = 0.057).

However, it was only near statistical significance ( P = 0.057) [ Figure 3b ].

The AM value was highest in the oldest group of students, with near statistical significance (p=0.057). 4.

In the three models, the effect of the use of anti‐inflammatory drugs on the occurrence of peri‐implantitis decreased to not significant values but resulted to be near statistical significance after adjustment for periodontal status ( p = .058).

Analysis of FBS values in the refractive error groups showed a difference that was near statistical significance (p=0.058).

Leptin levels tended to be lower in HFD + CfPulp-E compared to HFD, near statistical significance ( p -value = 0.059), and were not modified by the other by-products ( Table 3 ).

Other home environmental factors did not associate with children’s SED, although the relations between children’s higher SED and parent’s own higher screen time in the presence of the child was near statistical significance ( p = .059).

66% for ENE‐negative), with near statistical significance ( p = 0.059).

The total RAC significantly correlated with HV (Figure 2I ; r = ‐ 0.39, P = .04), whereas its correlation with ICV reached near statistical significance ( P = .06).

The combined effect of the different trap models (sector 4) also showed a mosquito reduction with near statistical significance (25.6% reduction; p = 0.06).

For ROCF score, we observed a positive correlation with CSF irisin ( p = 0.001; r = 0.468), and a positive trend near statistical significance for serum irisin ( p = 0.060; r = 0.331) (Figure 2D,H ).

A positive trend near statistical significance was also found for a lower N/L ratio ( p = 0.06).

5), in which the median scores were near statistical significance ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).

CRP was near statistical significance in its association with periodontitis (p = 0.060).

In addition, the effect size point estimate was 0.36 lower than the effect of the disorder-specific panic treatment, and the exploratory test for difference between TAIL-panic and DS-panic was near statistical significance ( P = 0.06).

Similar to miR-149, miR-202 expression at baseline was lowest in the ozone + in vivo LPS group, with exposure-dependent effects that were near statistical significance ( Figure 5B ; two-way ANOVA for in vivo exposure and in vitro LPS treatment; p = 0.06 for exposure and p = 0.04 for LPS). miR-202 decreased with in vitro LPS treatment compared to baseline values except in cultures with a history of ozone exposure ( p = 0.06 for ozone alone, p = 0.002 for ozone + in vivo LPS).

Nonetheless, both gender and employment status showed a near statistical significance (odds ratio (OR) = 1.73, 95% CI = 0.98–3.07, p = 0.06 and OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 0.97–3.16, p = 0.06, respectively) with females and employed respondents having higher knowledge level compared to males and unemployed individuals.