“near-significant”

The bath period showed a near-significant association with cream type ( p = 0.06), with coconut oil users predominantly bathing in the evening (43.8%), while plant-based cream users primarily bathed in the afternoon (76.0%).

The treatment main effect was not significant ( F 1,38 = 0.16; p = 0.69), but there was a near-significant treatment by age interaction effect ( F 1,215 = 3.51; p = 0.06).

Additionally, a near-significant association ( P =.06) between higher frequency of activity and an increase in perceived usefulness was found.

Similarly, there was a near-significant positive correlation seen in eyes with oval (in pattern 3) configuration (r = 0.34, P = 0.06) ( Fig 5 B).

A near-significant ( p = 0.06) relationship was observed between acrylamide metabolites and observation of incense.

Children in the UCT arm spent an average of .15 fewer hours in paid work each week than those in the control arm, a near-significant 18% difference ( p = .06).

Variables demonstrating a statistically significant association ( p < 0.05), as well as one variable showing a near-significant association ( p ≈ 0.06), were retained for further modelling.

The interaction terms between sedentary time and GDM status in relation to fasting and 2-h glucose were significant ( p < 0.05) and near-significant ( p = 0.06), respectively.

Compulsive usage was a near-significant predictor ( p = .06).

Onsets Carcass mass had a near-significant effect on the onset of bloating (ANOVA, F 3,14 = 3.02, P = 0.06; Fig. 2a ), no significant effect on the onset of active decay (ANOVA, F 3,14 = 1.51, P = 0.26; Fig. 2b ) and a significant effect on the onset of advanced decay (ANOVA, F 3,14 = 4.17, P = 0.03; Fig. 2c ).

There was near-significant difference by age in the proportion of women disclosing domestic and family violence ( p = 0.060).

MetS had a near-significant association with sex ( P = 0.06) but was not associated with age, race-ethnicity, cancer stage, performance status, ADI, cancer type, or ICI treatment.

In accordance with findings from the voxelwise TOI analyses, mean FA in the left SLF demonstrated a significant positive association with levels of self-reported social anxiety (β = 0.002, p = 0.03) and a near-significant association with levels of FNE (β = 3.67E-04, p = 0.06).

3.2 Relationship between IL-6, PCE score, and HRP In unadjusted models, the PCE score had a near-significant association with HRP prevalence (OR [95 % CI] per percent increase: 1.06 [1, 1.13], p = 0.06).

The only exception was ‘S_baseline2peak’, which exhibited a near-significant correlation with β-cell function ( P = 0.06).

Prehension There was a near-significant tendency for full-grasp to occur less frequently with increasing recall-delay [75% of trials for DT=0s and 57-67% for DT=2-10s; F(3,54)=2.62, p=0.060]; however, there was no significant effect on frequency of hand-handhold collision (2-8% of trials for DT=0-10s; p=0.42).

SMD-Q: Total Score The repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a large effect size and a near-significant effect of time (F (1, 20) = 3.860, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.162) with a 21.54% reduction in scores between baseline (5.91 ± 3.57) and post-treatment (4.64 ± 4.37); see Figure 2 A.

Urinary cadmium, but not blood cadmium, displayed a near-significant association ( p = 0.06) with bALP.

During Prepare , beta ERD showed near-significant differences (25% difference in sample means; p = 0.06).

The waist-to-height ratio was the most robust independent predictor of total and peripheral airway resistance, with increases in R5 (b=1.65, P =0.02) and R5–R20 (b=1.39, P =0.03) and a near-significant correlation with AX (b=12.12, P =0.06).

Concurrent surgery showed a near-significant benefit (HR = 1.98, 95 % CI: 0.96–4.06, p = 0.06).

ANOVA across all groups revealed near significant effects of group ( F = 3.32, df 2,21, p < 0.056) and dose ( F = 3.28, df 1,21, p < 0.085), a near-significant interaction of group × dose ( F = 3.24, df 2,21, p < 0.06), significant effects of prepulse interval ( F = 25.70, df 4,84, p < 0.0001), and a significant interaction of dose × interval ( F = 3.60, df 4,84, p < 0.01), but no significant three-way interaction.

However, there were near-significant correlations between the HVF area that improved and the number of training sessions performed ( figure 3D , r = 0.3378, t 20 = 1.6, p = 0.06), as well as between area improved and the number of locations trained ( figure 3E , r = 0.3408, t 20 = 0.162, p = 0.06).

In addition, we found a near-significant advantage for men relative to women ( r = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.31, 0.01], p = 0.06, n = 149, Fig 3B ).

This effect was not maintained at T3, although the result was near-significant with p = 0.06.