“near-significant”

The results indicated a near-significant positive correlation ( r τ = 0.02, z = 1.87, p = 0.06) such that, for example, the median rating of participants aged 17–25 was 6.7 [95 % CI (6.49, 6.90)], and the median rating of participants aged 30 to 35 was 7.95 [95 % CI (6.70, 9.19)].

The consistent dominance of DCE across all architectures (41.5–41.8%) and the near-significant p-value ( p = 0.06) suggest that the model learned clinically relevant vascular patterns complementary to traditional DWI assessment.

In 2016, there was a significant interaction between irrigation and grass origin in the North Field and a near-significant ( P = 0.06) interaction at the South Field ( Table 3(i) and 3(ii) ).

In the 600–900 ms time window, there was a near-significant main effect of condition F (2, 18) = 3.28, MSE = 6.38, p = .06 at midline sites, F (2, 18) = 3.33, MSE = 15.56, p = .06 at lateral sites, but a significant interaction between condition and anteriority, F (6, 54) = 3.29, MSE = 0.47, p < .01 at midline sites, F (12, 108) = 2.46, MSE = 0.73, p < .01 at lateral sites.

Nevertheless, AAV5 showed a near-significant difference ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ), with the model indicating higher median anti-AAV5 NAb titers in the invasive group compared to the non-invasive group.

It should be noted, however, that at the 2 min time point, means of salivary acetaldehyde between the groups showed a near-significant difference (p=0.06) which may become significant should the number of study subjects be considerably higher.

When we re-examined the time window 350–450 ms for the 23 subjects in the test phase, with Group as between-subjects variable, we observed, besides the significant interaction of Familiarity × Quadrant ( F 3,63 = 5.53, p = 0.003), two interactions with the factor Group: a significant Familiarity × Group ( F 1,21 = 24.3, p < 0.001), and a near-significant three-way Familiarity × Quadrant × Group ( F 3,63 = 2.67, p = 0.06).

Shell Strength Two-way ANOVA showed that temperature, but not pH, had a significant effect on the maximum load endured by the mussel shells (F = 31.624, p<0.001 and F = 1.131, p = 0.289, respectively), although there was a near-significant interaction between the two factors (F = 3.590, p = 0.060).

However, we clearly demonstrated trends reflecting that the in vitro assay supported a near-significant difference between TRE100 and TRE200 ( p < 0.06).

In addition, we found a near-significant advantage for men relative to women ( r = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.31, 0.01], p = 0.06, n = 149, Fig 3B ).

However, we did observe a near-significant decrease in alpha-diversity in participants who used an intrauterine hormonal contraceptive (IUD), based on Inverse Simpson Index ( P = 0.06).

The number of random responses was influenced by age (β = 0.36, p = 0.001) and there was a near-significant effect for the age × pain interaction term (β = 0.20, p = 0.06, Table 4 ).

The regression model combining these three variables resulted in an overall predictive performance of AUC = 0.905 (95% CI: 0.843, 0.966; P < 0.001), which was greater than the AUC of ΔADC 200,1000 alone, with a near-significant difference ( P = 0.060) (Fig. 5 ).

Despite the small data set, we found a strong and near-significant relationship (R2=0.29; p = 0.06) between the endotoxin-normalized TNF release and Fin (Figure 6A).

However, there were near-significant correlations between the HVF area that improved and the number of training sessions performed ( figure 3D , r = 0.3378, t 20 = 1.6, p = 0.06), as well as between area improved and the number of locations trained ( figure 3E , r = 0.3408, t 20 = 0.162, p = 0.06).

The variable time (days post exposure) has a near-significant positive effect (p = 0.06) on LVE of ticks given they are infected.

Subgroup analysis showed that CE significantly reduced BMI (MD = −1.25, 95% CI: [−1.96, −0.55], p < 0.001), AR showed a near-significant reduction (MD = −2.60, 95% CI: [−5.36, 0.16], p = 0.06), and RT did not reduce BMI (MD = −1.40, 95% CI: [−3.26, 0.46], p = 0.14).

In RTx patients, baseline telomere length showed a near-significant association with age ( P = 0.06), which was significant after 12 months (ρ = −0.36; P = 0.01).

Results showed no main effect of hemisphere ( p = 0.15) and a near-significant interaction effect between hemisphere and phonemic unit ( p = 0.06).

Reviewer #2(Public Review): The interpretation of p-values is rigid, and near-significant results (e.g., p = 0.06) are dismissed without discussion.

Mobility comparisons reveal a near-significant advantage for car drivers in flexion (mean difference: +3.280°; 95% CI [−0.144–6.704]; p = 0.060; d = 0.380, small-medium), implying ∼3° forward flexion.

There were no other significant changes in mitochondrial function in alligator hearts ( P >0.17 for all). In snapping turtles, there was a near-significant increase in the ETS capacity of thigh muscles from embryos to 30 day-old hatchlings ( F 3,15 =2.8, P =0.06; Fig. 5 ).

2c , the 90 μg antigen dose produced stronger responses, with or without aluminum phosphate, relative to the 60 μg dose, eliciting a near-significant 1.4-fold increase in response to unadjvuanted formulations (p = 0.06) and a significant 1.3-fold increase in response to adjvuanted formulations (p = 0.022,) on day 56.

Conversely, the near-significant difference in CVA occurrence (4.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.06) based on a single event in each group illustrates how unbalanced group sizes can affect statistical comparisons of rare events.

Conversely, GNA11 mutations were associated with Class 2 tumors ( p = 0.0005), PRAME (+) status ( p = 0.05), increased patient age ( p = 0.002), increased tumor diameter ( p = 0.004) and tumor thickness ( p = 0.002), and they showed a near-significant association with ciliary body involvement ( p = 0.06).