“near-significant”

For ECochG measurements, the median signal threshold was 70 (55–77.5) dB nHL and lay 30 dB higher ( Figure 3B ) compared to the preoperative BC threshold (near-significant moderate to strong effect size, R 2 = 0.48, p = 0.056).

The addition of smoking to the confounding factors detected a near-significant result (β = −0.34, p = 0.056).

A near-significant reduction in time from arrival to the operating room was also evident (91.8 versus 214.2 min, p = 0.056 ).

However, there was a positive correlation between GLUT1 and Ki-67 (Spearman's correlation=0.294, P =0.018) and a near-significant correlation between CAIX and Ki-67 (Spearman's correlation=0.24, P =0.056).

A near-significant increase in PCSK9 levels was obtained with breast disease severity (Fig. 3 A , p = 0.056).

There was however, a near-significant correlation with age (rho = 0.22, P = 0.056).

Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in potential moderators for the outcome of alcohol consumption, although there was a near-significant difference between comparisons with waitlist control and those with assessment-only or alcohol information control conditions ( p = .056).

Lens status and follow-up duration showed near-significant trends in the trabeculectomy arm (pseudophakia: p = 0.056; follow-up: p = 0.061), while prior glaucoma surgery and baseline medication burden were not significant effect modifiers (all p > 0.05).

Between-group comparisons revealed no significant difference in anxiety ( p = 0.95), a near-significant difference in avoidance ( p = 0.056), and a significant difference in discomfort with closeness ( p < 0.0001), with women scoring higher.

This analysis revealed no main effect of Stim_Familiarity, F (1,48) = 0.57, p = .452, η p 2 = .01, a near-significant main effect of Color–Response_Mapping, F (1,48) = 3.84, p = 0.056, η p 2 = .07, and no Stim_Familiarity x Color–Response_Mapping interaction, F (1,48) = 2.26, p = .140, η p 2 = .04 ( Fig 2B ).

We would like to note that, in adults at baseline, the association between ADHD symptom severity and cortical thickness of the left prefrontal ROI was near-significant (r = -0.40, P = .056).

Memory condition exhibited near-significant trend toward predicting lower sadness recovery, b = −1.9007, p = 0.056, 95% CI [−3.8529, 0.0516].

Concerning the first research hypothesis (H1a), the results from ANOVA ( Figure 6 ) reveal a near-significant main effect of the group ( F (3, 46) = 2.706, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.150), with participants with natural scenarios as their recovery scenario reporting higher valence ratings than those in the Neutral group.

(2011 ) found near-significant differences in N 2 content (P=0.056) between samples transported in the passenger cabin of a commercial jet aircraft and control samples, and recommended transporting samples inside a pressure resistant vessel to ensure that no changes in gas composition would occur during aircraft transportation [ 12 ].

Indeed, when compared across the experimental phases, cerebellar cTDCS significantly impaired motor adaptation of the proximal upper-limb compared to M1 stimulation, with a near-significant impairment compared to sham ( p = 0.056).

When comparing sitting to static standing, there was a near-significant increase of 113.7% of total movement ( p = 0.056).

Given that the boolean variables of fixation and saccade are in most cases opposite (or equivalently, a near-perfect negative correlation), we believe that the near-significant insignificance ( p = 0.056 ) could be due to random fluctuation, and hence that the time ratio of fixation actually has a relation with the intensity of visual stimulation. 3.3.3.

However, a near-significant drug*time interaction was observed for baseline gamma (F(1,13)=4.41, p =0.056), non-baselined analyses were conducted, which still revealed a significant drug*time interaction for residual, active–baseline period gamma amplitude (F(1,13)=6.42, p =0.025).

It should also be noted that the control group showed a near-significant improvement in VO 2 max (+2.96%, p = 0.056).

Errors with interruptive CDS saw significant reductions in error rate after CPOE implementation at site 1 (2.9% vs 0.3%, P<0.001) and site 2 (5.5% vs 3.0%, P=0.002), with a near-significant reduction at site 3 (7.8% vs 5.7%, P=0.056).

In males, there was a significant effect of stress ( F (1, 46) = 10.94, P < 0.01); a treatment x stress interaction ( F (2,46) = 3.642, P < 0.05); and a near-significant main effect of treatment ( F (2,46) = 3.057, P = 0.056; Fig. 3f ).

The blastomere size variability in two-cell embryos was near-significant for the group factor ( F 3,180 = 2.56, p = 0.056) but not for the survival factor ( F 1,180 = 1.46, p = 0.23; Figure 7 A) or the factor interaction, according to the two-way ANOVA.

Medical students (B = 11.97, p = 0.042, effect size = 0.015) had significantly higher scores, whereas healthcare workers showed a near-significant positive trend ( B = 12.44, p = 0.056).

Our study showed significant differences for MCP-1 ( p = 0.014) and near-significant difference for CD40 ( p = 0.056).

In multivariable analysis, age remained the only independent predictor of OS (adjusted HR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07–1.14; p <0.0001), whereas TM retained a near-significant association (adjusted HR 2.13; 95% CI, 0.98–4.61; p =0.056).