Barely Significant
← all phrases

“near significance”

506 sentences · 506 papers · 894 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
The results of multiple comparisons among the three surgical subgroups showed that interleukin-8 levels in the aortic surgery group (median, 100 pg/mL; IQR, 32–196 pg/mL) tended to be higher than the valve surgery group (median, 49 pg/mL; IQR, 31–79 pg/mL) with near significance ( p = 0.065), and significantly higher than the OPCAB group (median, 35 pg/mL; IQR, 20–57 pg/mL) ( p = 0.001).
near significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
In contrast, amongst cases with H3K27me3 signal loss, a significant likelihood of disease progression was observed on log-rank testing ( p = 0.003, Figure 3B ), amongst midline tumors ( p < 0.0043, Figure 3C ), in females ( p = 0.038, Figure 3D ), children less than 5 years of age ( p = 0.017, Figure 3E ), children more than 10 years of age ( p = 0.002, Figure 3F ), and near significance in children with WHO-grade IV tumors ( p = 0.065, Table 3B ).
near significancep = 0.0661.3× alphagold
Introduced cases situation For the scenario of disease case introduction, we only obtained significant explanatory linear models for DEN, but not for CHIK and ZIKA (for the perception of the future risk of chikungunya case introduction nationwide, only the NPS variable was near significance; F = 3.481, p = 0.066).
near significanceP = 0.0671.3× alphagold
A genomic region on SSC16 achieved near significance level ( P = 0.067) in NPL analysis, so functional candidate genes of Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor A 6 ( GABRA 6) and dopamine receptor D 1 ( DRD 1) were also investigated to confirm whether the QTL exited or not.
near significanceP = 0.071.4× alphagold
P-selectin exposure in response to CRP-XL showed a similar trend where the MFI at maximum concentration of CRP-XL was higher in the term neonates compared to the premature babies, which again reached significance for the 30–36-week group (12,549 ± 2877 vs 32,030 ± 10,535, P = 0.03) and near significance in the <29-week group ( P = 0.07, Fig. 3d, e ).