Since the aim of a screening programme is the detection of CRC and AA, results are presented for the AN group (712 ± 356 ng/mL), showing statistical differences near significance when compared to no neoplasia (median difference 66 ng/mL, 95% bootstrap CI: −31–190; Mann-Whitney U test, p -value = 0.056).
← all phrases
“near significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
The KW analysis showed statistically significant differences for αKGDH in the soleus muscle and a near significance ( p = 0.056) for CS in the EDL.
In the right hippocampus, the correlation between grade and the contrast of addition sign-only trials versus baseline sign-only trials, was also near significance ( r = 0.33, p = 0.056; BF 10 = 1.22). 2 The correlation between grade and the contrast of multiplication sign-only trials versus baseline sign-only trials, however, was not significant ( r = −0.18, p = 0.32; BF 10 = 0.35). 3.3 Spatial hippocampal activity in response to a ‘+’ sign relates to an addition-priming effect in children from higher grades We then tested whether the hippocampal response to a ‘+’ sign observed in children from higher grades was related to the operator-priming effect.
No significant interaction effect was found, but for the soleus a near significance with moderate effect size for the change in oxygen saturation from the start to minimal and end of the sets was found (F (2,44) = 2.99–3.08, p = 0.056–0.06, η 2 = 0.12).
Our model identified a significant interaction of seasonality and ONI on river discharge (p < 0.0001) and cation fluxes (p < 0.0001) and near significance on sediment fluxes (p = 0.056) (Supplementary Table 9 ).
At 3 months post-injury, mean sleep bouts were near significance ( p = 0.0569) at ZT14, with rmTBI mice averaging 315 ± 116-sec sleep bouts compared to 420 ± 82-sec sleep bouts for sham controls ( Fig. 3D ).
Additionally, the beta coefficient for non-food interference was positive and near significance level, β = 0.21, p = 0.057, indicating that greater non-food interference was associated with higher scores of EE throughout the sample.
DJ‐1 knockdown cells displayed a reduced number of anterograde and retrograde motile events near significance ( P = 0.057) compared to control cells (Figure 2 B,C).
ΣPFASs and the other PFAS compounds showed a similar trend but were only near significance ( p -value ~ 0.057–0.071) ( Tables S8–S11 in the Supplementary Material ).
Shed P2X7R positively correlated with ALT (r = 0.269; p = 0.012) and negatively with BNP (r = -0.361; p = 0.007), indexes of liver and heart injury or stress, respectively, and, at near significance, with sNLRP3 (r = 0.218; p = 0.057) ( Table 6 ).
Patients with ≥ 5 CTCs had a higher relative expression of the epithelial marker KRT19 or the prostate-specific marker KLK3 (p < 0.0001) while EpCAM higher expression was near significance (p = 0.057) (Fig. 2 ) and KLK3 , KRT19 and EpCAM relative expression associated also among them (p < 0.01).
In multivariate analysis, the duration of ART had various relationships with virologic response, with the odds ratio for two years reaching near significance (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.98–3.59, p = 0.057).
4.2 Soil and ecosystem respiration Overall, R soil (dark CO 2 release from soil) was reduced in damaged and—with near significance ( p = 0.057)—in stressed plots across the three measurement periods (Figure 1 c).
This expansion was near significance as compared to CVID subjects ( p = 0.0571).
Sepsis tended to be a related factor with OR near significance (OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 0.94–28; P=0.058).
The mean number of substitutions accumulated in U6b lineages (Table 1 ) is significantly smaller than those in U6a (P = 0.013) and is near significance in U6c (P = 0.058).
intracellulare -infected pre-AAT infused MDM + 10% plasma; the mean densitometry measurements normalized for β-actin showed near significance ( p = 0.058).
The difference between V-8 and V-C in LPC-1 in the right recording sites was near significance (p = 0.058).
It is interesting to note that sustained responders have significantly lower UNT values than moderate responders (and comparison to non-responder UNT is near significance at p = 0.058, Fig. 2 b), and in fact the “robust activation” seen in sustained responders simply brings their Nrf2 activation levels near the UNT levels in the other two groups.
Tb.N was also significantly higher and Conn.D numerically higher with near significance ( P =0.058) in the OVX-Up group compared to the OVX-Cont group, whereas Tb.Sp and SMI were significantly lower in the OVX-Up group compared to the OVX-Cont group (P<0.05).
The absolute interocular CT difference between the nasal peripapillary and macular area showed a near significance ( p = 0.058) ( Table 4 ). 3.4.
The overall model in the mask condition was near significance, F (3, 96) = 2.58, p = .058, R 2 = .74.
Patients with high level of HSP60 tended to have a better OS than those with low level of HSP60, a more dramatic difference was observed after a 60 month-time point, demonstrating near significance ( p = 0.058).
13.4 ± 8.2 μm), and near significance in OD ( P = 0.058, 10.4 ± 7.8 vs. 13.6 ± 8.2 μm).
Looking at the experimental results of pathologies, we can establish that in-air L movements are not relevant but there are some exceptions: crossed pentagon task for depression patients in EMOTHAW, which is near significance ( p = 0.0589 for time and p = 0.0561 for strokes), letter l task for PaHaW database ( p = 0.0157 for time), and crossed pentagons task for Alzheimer/control comparison ( p = 0.0122 for time).