Barely Significant
← all phrases

“moderately significant”

2,179 sentences · 2,179 papers · 2,611 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11p>0.11

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Among the five selected genes ( GAR1 , PER3 , MTPAP , SLC25A26 , and CD19 ), only one gene, GAR1 , showed moderately significant upregulation, while PER3 , MTPAP , SLC25A26 , and CD19 were significantly upregulated in the patients’ group when compared to the healthy controls with fold change value (PER3: 2.42, CD19: 6.15, MTPAP: 3.99, SLC25A26: 1.24).
Part of the reason that changes in R were limited and those in f were only moderately significant was the inclusion of two cells (of 16) in which exposure to a high [Ca 2+ ] cyto led to a sudden decrease in [Ca 2+ ] SR and three others in which the increase in [Ca 2+ ] SR was associated with a reduction or no change in f .
They were classified into highly significant, moderately significant, stable, slightly insignificant and insignificant in terms of realizing the “dual carbon” targets. 20 units would reach their carbon peaking before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. 23 units would reach their carbon peaking before 2030, with a significant downward trend in subsequent CE , but would not achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. 11 units would reach their carbon peaking before 2030 under both baseline and low-carbon scenarios but still would not achieve carbon neutrality by 2060.
Indicating the efficacy of using Farsi’s criteria to assess oral dryness, a moderately significant negative association was discovered between “unstimulated salivary flow,” “stimulated salivary flow rate,” and “subjective oral dryness.” This indicates a connection between salivary flow and caries, and a marginally significant negative association was discovered between “unstimulated salivary flow,” “stimulated salivary flow rate,” and “dental caries.” Therefore, perceived dryness may be a sign of cavities development and salivary flow rate.
Again, we should caution that the basal Y118 signal in LNCaP cell was very weak to begin with, and that the decrease in signal quantitated on the right ( Figure 3 C, left panel), despite its annotation as moderately significant, should be considered in the context of whether a “weak signal” becoming “negligible” can be taken as a possible indication of biological significance for motility.