Barely Significant
← all phrases

“moderately significant”

2,179 sentences · 2,179 papers · 2,611 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11p>0.11

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Stressors X socializing frequency (Models 6 & 7) Modification of the relationships between the sex-specific and socialization rate-based CES-D-10 trajectories by stressors (i.e., socializing frequency X sex interaction X stressors) was moderately significant in Model 6 (Stress & Online Socializing Model) and Model 7 (Stress & In-person Socializing Model); the significance of the stress interaction terms as a group in the Stress & Online Socializing Model was P = .02 (Model 6; LR X 2 = 21.8, df = 11).
The findings contradicted those of a recent review, in which the use of supportive methods, such as text messages and take-home reading materials, with health education yielded a moderately significant effect in improving both SBP and DBP among patients with HTN [ 18 ].
In 2020 though, the weather conditions explained 20 % of the variance in the total number of photos in all parks on a daily basis (linear model, R 2 adj = 0.2, p < 0.01, all parameters –– were significant predictors), and 32 % of the variance - on a weekly basis (linear model, R 2 adj = 0.32, p < 0.01, median daily noon temperature was the only moderately significant predictor).
The second principal component, accounting for 19.2% of the total bean-disease-weed data variance, demonstrated the moderately significant contributions of the initial bean dry matter (constant term or exponential parameter a ) and the dry matter increase factor (exponential parameter b ) to characterize a diverse range of bean-disease-weed development curves developed during two growth seasons ( Table 5 ).
In the most significant HLA-DRA-DQA1 region, conditioning on HLA-DRB1 Leu67 ( P = 1.14 × 10 −29 , OR = 1.3) and HLA-DQA1 His129 ( P = 1.56 × 10 −13 , OR = 1.19) removed the effect of DQA1*01:02 ( P = 7.04 × 10 −22 , OR = 0.75, conditional P value is 0.54), DQA1*03:01 ( P = 3.99 × 10 −10 , OR = 1.27, conditional P value is 0.36), and rs3135359 ( P = 8.82 × 10 −21 , OR = 1.21, conditional P value is 0.06); however, the effect of rs2894257 ( P = 8.16 × 10 −36 , OR = 1.36, conditional P value is 1.2 × 10 −7 ) remained moderately significant.
For the first area of investigation (physical wellbeing—physical activities and health), the differences obtained were moderately significant (r = 0.41–0.48) between items 2–4 for the children living in both cities and statistically significant (r = 0.51) only for the children of Arad, between the 3rd and the 4th items at the first phase of evaluation.